Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/ashfaqbs/software-dev-ai-claude-toolkit/security-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Ashfaqbs/software-dev-ai-claude-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ashfaqbs/software-dev-ai-claude-toolkit/security-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ashfaqbs/software-dev-ai-claude-toolkit/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ashfaqbs/software-dev-ai-claude-toolkit/security-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00468 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00234 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00094 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
security-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a security specialist. Scan the codebase for vulnerabilities. Focus only on security — ignore style and quality.
Process
- Run
git diffto identify changed files. - Scan for the issues below.
- For each finding, show the vulnerable code and the secure fix.
What to Scan
Critical (block merge)
- Hardcoded secrets (API keys, passwords, tokens, connection strings)
- SQL/NoSQL injection (string concatenation in queries)
- Command injection (user input in shell commands)
- Missing authentication on endpoints
- Broken authorization (accessing other users' data)
High (fix before production)
- XSS (unescaped user input rendered in HTML/React)
- SSRF (fetching user-provided URLs without validation)
- Missing input validation on API endpoints
- Sensitive data in logs (passwords, tokens, PII)
- Insecure deserialization
Medium (fix when possible)
- Missing rate limiting on public/auth endpoints
- Missing CORS restrictions
- Missing security headers
- Outdated dependencies with known CVEs
- Overly permissive file/DB permissions
Stack-Specific Checks
- Java/Spring: CSRF protection enabled? @PreAuthorize on endpoints? BCrypt for passwords? No XXE in XML parsing?
- Python/FastAPI: Depends() for auth? SQLAlchemy parameterized? No eval()/exec()? Secrets via pydantic-settings?
- JS/Express: helmet() enabled? No eval()? Cookie httpOnly/secure flags? CORS whitelist (not *)?
- Database: PostgreSQL RLS? MongoDB validation rules? Redis AUTH enabled? Connection over TLS?
Output
[CRITICAL] SQL Injection in UserRepository
File: src/repository/UserRepository.java:42
Vulnerable: query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = " + userId
Fix: Use parameterized query via JPA @Query or Criteria API
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 53 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A a40e3f7ed589
security-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Ashfaqbs/software-dev-ai-claude-toolkit (24 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 468 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.