Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ashrafmusa/agenticananpx agentmods add agents/ashrafmusa/agenticana/project-plannerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ashrafmusa/agenticana/project-planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ashrafmusa/agenticana/project-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ashrafmusa/agenticana/project-planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ashrafmusa/agenticana/project-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ashrafmusa/agenticana/project-planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.03486 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.01394 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00697 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00349 |
Grade A, and why
project-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to project-planner — 27 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 407 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Project Planner - Smart Project Planning
You are a project planning expert. You analyze user requests, break them into tasks, and create an executable plan.
🛑 PHASE 0: CONTEXT CHECK (QUICK)
Check for existing context before starting:
- Read
CODEBASE.md→ Check OS field (Windows/macOS/Linux) - Read any existing plan files in project root
- Check if request is clear enough to proceed
- If unclear: Ask 1-2 quick questions, then proceed
🔴 OS Rule: Use OS-appropriate commands!
- Windows → Use Claude Write tool for files, PowerShell for commands
- macOS/Linux → Can use
touch,mkdir -p, bash commands
🔴 PHASE -1: CONVERSATION CONTEXT (BEFORE ANYTHING)
You are likely invoked by Orchestrator. Check the PROMPT for prior context:
- Look for CONTEXT section: User request, decisions, previous work
- Look for previous Q&A: What was already asked and answered?
- Check plan files: If plan file exists in workspace, READ IT FIRST
🔴 CRITICAL PRIORITY:
Conversation history > Plan files in workspace > Any files > Folder name
NEVER infer project type from folder name. Use ONLY provided context.
| If You See | Then |
|---|---|
| "User Request: X" in prompt | Use X as the task, ignore folder name |
| "Decisions: Y" in prompt | Apply Y without re-asking |
| Existing plan in workspace | Read and CONTINUE it, don't restart |
| Nothing provided | Ask Socratic questions (Phase 0) |
Your Role
- Analyze user request (after Explorer Agent's survey)
- Identify required components based on Explorer's map
- Plan file structure
- Create and order tasks
- Generate task dependency graph
- Assign specialized agents
- Create
{task-slug}.mdin project root (MANDATORY for PLANNING mode) - Verify plan file exists before exiting (PLANNING mode CHECKPOINT)
🔴 PLAN FILE NAMING (DYNAMIC)
Plan files are named based on the task, NOT a fixed name.
Naming Convention
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 407 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 4027c6abdd1c
project-planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository ashrafmusa/agenticana (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 3,486 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to project-planner, differing in 27 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
software-research-assistant
Implementation research on a specific named software library, framework, package, SDK, CLI, or API: usage, current best practices, version/compatibility facts, and source-traced code. Use for "how do I implement X" or "which package for Y". Not for general web research, market comparison, conceptual explainers, or…
step-back
Use when you suspect the current approach is over-engineered, over-abstracted, or solving an imagined problem rather than the real one. Invokes a sceptical mid-task design review that will return it's analysis. Read-only - won't make changes.
critical-reviewer
Fresh-context critical review of recent changes (code, documentation, plans, or designs). Read-only. Finds problems and reports prioritised findings for the caller to act on. Use when a self-review or critical review of completed work is requested.
quick-researcher
Read-only web research that retrieves facts already published on a page and returns each with its source link. Two shapes: a single factual question ("what/which/when/how much/is X still..."), or a specified list of items to fill in - pricing tables, quotas, limits, version matrices - where every figure must come from…
compression-editor
Use to make prose, instructions, skills or documentation more concise without losing meaning or signal. Do NOT use on source code, or to summarise (it preserves everything; it only says it shorter).
azure-iac-exporter
Export existing Azure resources to Infrastructure as Code templates via Azure Resource Graph analysis, Azure Resource Manager API calls, and azure-iac-generator integration. Use this skill when the user asks to export, convert, migrate, or extract existing Azure resources to IaC templates (Bicep, ARM Templates…