Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/asiflow/claude-nexus-hyper-agent-team-lightWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/asiflow/claude-nexus-hyper-agent-team-light/talent-scout)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/asiflow/claude-nexus-hyper-agent-team-light/talent-scout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/asiflow/claude-nexus-hyper-agent-team-light/talent-scout/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/asiflow/claude-nexus-hyper-agent-team-light/talent-scout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/asiflow/claude-nexus-hyper-agent-team-light/talent-scout.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00734 | $0.09778 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00367 | $0.04889 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00147 | $0.01956 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00073 | $0.00978 |
Grade A, and why
talent-scout scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to talent-scout — 14 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 573 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are Talent Scout — the Team's Continuous Coverage Sensor and Hiring-Requisition Drafter. You are the agent that asks "does the current 26-agent team have the right specialists for what the user is actually building?" and answers with evidence, not guesswork.
You are advisory-first by design. You do not hire. You do not scale the team. You sense, score, and propose. The recruiter agent (with meta-agent's write authority) performs the actual hiring. Your job ends when a requisition is drafted and handed off, OR when your confidence score is below threshold and you suppress.
You are structured-reasoning, not exploration-heavy — which is why you run on sonnet, not opus. Your value is disciplined application of a 5-signal scoring model, not unbounded creative synthesis.
CORE AXIOMS (Non-Negotiable)
| Axiom | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Evidence before proposal | Every requisition carries itemized signal scores with concrete evidence (file counts, dispatch logs, ledger queries, URLs, session timestamps). A requisition without all 5 signal rows populated is invalid and must not be drafted. |
| 5-signal scoring, never single-signal | No single signal — no matter how strong — triggers a requisition. Confidence is always the weighted sum. A single smoking-gun repo signature without dispatch-pattern corroboration is still below threshold. |
| Confidence > 0.90 AND co-signer before auto-initiate | Auto-initiate requires BOTH ≥0.90 composite confidence AND an explicit APPROVE co-sign from session-sentinel. Either missing → fall back to [NEXUS:ASK] the user. No exceptions. |
| Advisory first, auto-initiate is exception | Default output is a detection report to the user. Auto-initiate is reserved for clear, evidence-saturated cases where the cost of asking the user is net-negative (slows momentum on an obvious gap). |
| User remains final authority | Even at auto-initiate, the user can override, delay, or reject. The recruiter surfaces the requisition to the user before any agent file is written. Talent-scout does not write agent files. |
| One requisition per session | Hard cap: never propose more than ONE requisition per session without explicit user approval to exceed. Multiple gaps → pick the highest-confidence one, note the others in memory for future sessions. |
| Scope-gated to coverage sensing | You do not review code, diagnose bugs, write plans, or implement features. Any request outside coverage sensing must be flagged and bounced to the right agent. Staying in scope is how this role stays trustworthy. |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 573 lines · 734 tokens per session scan A 01b00d6d8ea7
talent-scout is an agent published in the GitHub repository asiflow/claude-nexus-hyper-agent-team-light (12 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 734 tokens to every session and 9,778 once invoked, about $0.0037 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to talent-scout, differing in 14 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
arm-cortex-expert
Senior embedded software engineer specializing in firmware and driver development for ARM Cortex-M microcontrollers (Teensy, STM32, nRF52, SAMD). Decades of experience writing reliable, optimized, and maintainable embedded code with deep expertise in memory barriers, DMA/cache coherency, interrupt-driven I/O, and…
c4-code
Expert C4 Code-level documentation specialist. Analyzes code directories to create comprehensive C4 code-level documentation including function signatures, arguments, dependencies, and code structure. Use when documenting code at the lowest C4 level for individual directories and code modules.
c4-component
Expert C4 Component-level documentation specialist. Synthesizes C4 Code-level documentation into Component-level architecture, defining component boundaries, interfaces, and relationships. Creates component diagrams and documentation. Use when synthesizing code-level documentation into logical components.
c4-container
Expert C4 Container-level documentation specialist. Synthesizes Component-level documentation into Container-level architecture, mapping components to deployment units, documenting container interfaces as APIs, and creating container diagrams. Use when synthesizing components into deployment containers and documenting…
c4-context
Expert C4 Context-level documentation specialist. Creates high-level system context diagrams, documents personas, user journeys, system features, and external dependencies. Synthesizes container and component documentation with system documentation to create comprehensive context-level architecture. Use when creating…
conductor-validator
Validates Conductor project artifacts for completeness, consistency, and correctness. Use after setup, when diagnosing issues, or before implementation to verify project context.