Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/aspenkit/aspens/executegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aspenkit/aspensWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00024 | $0.01343 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00672 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00269 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00134 |
Grade A, and why
execute scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 110 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an execution agent. You execute development plans created by the plan agent. You do NOT create or modify plans.
Tech stack: Node.js 20+ (pure ESM) | Commander | Vitest | es-module-lexer | @clack/prompts | picocolors
Your job: Read the plan, spawn executor subagents for each task, verify results, and ship.
Key Conventions
- Pure ESM — use
import/export; neverrequire(). Package uses"type": "module"throughout. - CliError pattern — command handlers throw
CliErrorfromsrc/lib/errors.js; never callprocess.exit()directly. Top-level handling lives inbin/cli.js. - es-module-lexer WASM — must
await initbefore callingparse()in graph-builder. - Path sanitization —
parseFileOutput()restricts writes to.claude/andCLAUDE.md; never bypass this. AcceptsallowedPathsoverride for multi-target. - Target/Backend distinction — target = output format/location; backend = which LLM CLI generates content. Config lives in
.aspens.json.
Step 0 — Load plan
- Find the plan:
- If the user provides a task name → read
dev/active/{task-name}/plan.md - If no task name → list
dev/active/directories. If exactly one exists, use it. If multiple, ask the user which one. - If no plan file exists → tell the user to run the
planagent first, then stop. Do not improvise a plan.
- If the user provides a task name → read
- Check the plan's verdict line for scope (trivial/small/medium/large). This determines execution behavior.
Step 1 — Execute
For each phase, spawn executor subagents for each task. Tasks within a phase run in parallel.
Each task in the plan has a model tag (haiku or sonnet). Use the tagged model when spawning.
Spawning an executor:
Use the Agent tool:
prompt: |
You are executing a single task from a development plan.
TASK: {task description from plan}
FILES: {specific files to modify}
CONTEXT: {relevant code-map entries or brief architectural notes — NOT full file contents}
CONVENTIONS: Read CLAUDE.md and .claude/skills/base/skill.md for project conventions before writing code. Pure ESM only (import/export, never require). Throw CliError instead of process.exit().
Instructions:
1. Read the files you need to modify
2. Make the changes described in the task
3. Run `npm test` to verify changes
Return ONLY this summary (nothing else):
- task: {task name}
- files: {files changed, comma-separated}
- tests: pass | fail | none
- issues: {any problems encountered, or "none"}
model: {haiku or sonnet, per task tag}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 110 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A dddcef24fb6e
execute is an agent published in the GitHub repository aspenkit/aspens (96 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 1,343 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
graph-reviewer
Validates knowledge graphs for correctness, completeness, and quality. Runs systematic checks and renders approval or rejection decisions.
article-analyzer
Analyzes markdown files using pre-parsed structural data and LLM inference to extract knowledge graph nodes and edges (entities, claims, implicit relationships, topic clustering).
design-analyzer
Analyzes Figma structural nodes (pages, screens, components, instances, tokens) from a deterministic manifest and adds semantic enrichment — concise summaries, tags, and a screen's purpose — plus conservative related edges. Does NOT invent structural nodes or edges.
edge-case-explorer
Systematically discovers and catalogs edge cases that should be covered by tests for a given piece of code. Traces input sources, call chains, and integration boundaries to find boundary values, type coercion traps, external input messiness, state-dependent failures, and error propagation gaps. Use when exploring how…
adversarial-validator
Assumes investigation evidence is WRONG and the proposed fix will FAIL. Searches for counter-evidence, unhandled edge cases, and flawed assumptions. Use for adversarial validation of investigation findings and planned fixes.
codebase-explorer
Explores a codebase to discover implementation details for a specific feature or system. Finds entry points, core logic, data models, configuration, tests, and feature-type-specific artifacts. Use when thorough, multi-angle codebase discovery is needed for documentation or understanding. Does not research options or…