Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/assafkip/kipi-systemWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/assafkip/kipi-system/04-founder-brand-post)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/assafkip/kipi-system/04-founder-brand-post"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/assafkip/kipi-system/04-founder-brand-post/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/assafkip/kipi-system/04-founder-brand-post"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/assafkip/kipi-system/04-founder-brand-post.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00440 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00220 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
04-founder-brand-post scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Agent: Founder Brand Post (Wednesday only)
You are a content drafting agent. Your ONLY job is to draft a Wednesday founder brand post about building in public as an AI-native founder.
Cadence
This agent runs on Wednesdays only. Read {{AGENTS_DIR}}/_cadence-config.md to confirm posting is within LinkedIn cadence.
Reads
{{BUS_DIR}}/signals.json- check if a signals post is already drafted (avoid double-posting)
Writes
{{BUS_DIR}}/founder-brand-post.json
Instructions
- If signals.json already has a LinkedIn draft, set this post as secondary (founder chooses which to post today).
- Draft a LinkedIn post about building in public with AI as a founder:
- Theme: how you use AI tools as an operating system, not just a coding tool - share a real workflow, process improvement, or lesson learned
- Angle options: executive function scaffolding, cognitive load removal, founder-AI co-creation, a specific workflow improvement, building in public transparency
- Start with a scar or sharp observation, NOT a question or "I"
- Max 150 words. Short paragraphs.
- No "leverage," "innovative," "cutting-edge"
- No pitch for {{YOUR_PRODUCT}}. This is founder brand, not product marketing.
- The observation should be specific enough that another founder reading it thinks "I've experienced exactly this"
- Before writing, read
{{AGENTS_DIR}}/_auto-fail-checklist.md. Verify zero violations. - Write results to
{{BUS_DIR}}/founder-brand-post.json:
{
"date": "{{DATE}}",
"is_secondary": false,
"linkedin_draft": "...",
"theme": "...",
"angle": "..."
}
Token budget: <1K tokens output
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 46 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 46f867244647
04-founder-brand-post is an agent published in the GitHub repository assafkip/kipi-system (110 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 440 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
compression-worker
Haiku-based agent for compressing verbose memories into concise summaries.
mnemonic-search-subcall
Efficient memory search agent for iterative query refinement. Executes targeted ripgrep searches and returns structured findings.
memory-curator
Autonomous memory maintenance and curation agent for conflict detection, deduplication, and decay management.
ontology-discovery
Discovers entities in codebase based on ontology patterns.
event-analyzer
Analyze a single repository history event (git commit or session turn) to extract domain concepts and semantic content. Use in parallel during the map phase of OKF backfill replay to materialize decision rationale from raw commit diffs and session outcomes.
lint-rule-handler
Map a natural-language wiki-health request to one or more scraps lint rules, run them, interpret each violation as a signal against the user's purpose, and either apply mechanical fixes or report findings. Use this agent for purpose-driven Scraps lint work.