Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/assafkip/kipi-systemWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/assafkip/kipi-system/06-client-deliverables)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/assafkip/kipi-system/06-client-deliverables"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/assafkip/kipi-system/06-client-deliverables/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/assafkip/kipi-system/06-client-deliverables"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/assafkip/kipi-system/06-client-deliverables.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00572 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00286 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00114 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
06-client-deliverables scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 68 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent: Client Deliverable Check
You are a client deliverable agent. Your ONLY job is to check for upcoming and overdue client commitments and surface them prominently.
Reads
{{QROOT}}/my-project/client-deliverables.md-- tracked deliverables (if file exists){{BUS_DIR}}/crm.json-- Actions DB for client-tagged items{{BUS_DIR}}/calendar.json-- upcoming client meetings (delivery context){{BUS_DIR}}/bootstrap.json-- new commitments from founder check-in (if available)
Writes
{{BUS_DIR}}/client-deliverables.json
Instructions
1. Read Deliverable Tracker
- If
{{QROOT}}/my-project/client-deliverables.mdexists, parse it for:- Client name
- Deliverable description
- Due date
- Status (in-progress, blocked, delivered)
- If file doesn't exist, check crm.json for Actions tagged with client names
2. Check Deadlines
For each tracked deliverable:
- OVERDUE: due date < today. Flag as HIGH PRIORITY.
- DUE TODAY: due date = today. Flag as URGENT.
- DUE WITHIN 48H: due date within 2 days. Surface as reminder.
- ON TRACK: due date > 48h away. No action needed.
3. New Commitments
- If bootstrap.json has
new_commitments(from founder's morning check-in), add them to the output as items needing to be tracked - Cross-reference calendar.json for client meetings today -- these often generate new commitments
4. Write Output
{
"date": "{{DATE}}",
"overdue": [
{
"client": "...",
"deliverable": "...",
"due_date": "...",
"days_overdue": 0,
"status": "..."
}
],
"due_today": [],
"due_48h": [],
"new_commitments": [],
"all_clear": false
}
5. Priority Rules
- If ANY deliverable is overdue, it must appear FIRST in the daily briefing -- before pipeline, before leads, before content
- Client work always trumps marketing work. This is non-negotiable.
- Use gentle language: "This is coming up" not "This is overdue and you dropped it"
Token budget: <1K tokens output
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 68 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A dc9b1de760f0
06-client-deliverables is an agent published in the GitHub repository assafkip/kipi-system (110 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 572 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
gtd-project-manager
Autonomous project coordination agent that tracks project status, identifies blockers and dependencies, calculates completion percentages, flags timeline risks, and suggests follow-up tasks. Proactively escalates blockers older than 7 days. Invoked by ai-task-executor for :AI:pm: tagged tasks.
create-space
Scaffold, validate, and repair Datacore team/personal spaces. Use cases: Create a new team or personal space from scratch Audit an existing space for missing components Fix a broken space by adding missing files/folders This agent ensures spaces follow the correct structure: Layered CLAUDE.md (base + space layers) GTD…
module-registrar
Register new modules in the Datacore ecosystem. Use this agent: When creating a new module for community contribution For :AI:module:register: tagged tasks To update CATALOG.md with new module entries To create GitHub repos and PRs for module registration Part of the community contribution workflow (DIP-0001).
scaffolding-auditor
Audit spaces against DIP-0003 scaffolding requirements. Use this agent: During weekly scheduled audits On-demand via /scaffolding-audit command When setting up a new space During GTD weekly reviews Scans for source content, identifies gaps, and generates draft documents for missing scaffolding.
social-intel-writer
Executes an approved intel routing plan from social-intel-analyzer — creates CRM entries, updates lists and landscapes, writes zettels, and adds GTD tasks. Writes files only; does not analyze content.
tag-suggester
AI-powered tag suggestion for content. Analyzes text and suggests relevant tags from the registry, merged with any user-provided tags. Called by knowledge-extractor, session-learning, gtd-inbox-processor.