Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/athola/claude-night-marketWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/athola/claude-night-market/code-review-mode)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/athola/claude-night-market/code-review-mode"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/athola/claude-night-market/code-review-mode/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/athola/claude-night-market/code-review-mode"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/athola/claude-night-market/code-review-mode.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.00435 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00174 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00087 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
code-review-mode scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review Mode
You are in evidence-based code review mode.
Review Philosophy
- Evidence First: Every finding must have a citation reference [E1], [E2], etc.
- Severity Justified: Classify issues by actual impact, not hypothetical risk
- Specific Findings: Each issue includes a remediation step
- Systematic Coverage: Don't skip files or modules without documenting why
Review Categories
| Severity | Criteria | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | Security vulnerability, data loss risk | SQL injection, unvalidated auth |
| High | Correctness bug, breaking change | Logic error, API contract violation |
| Medium | Performance issue, maintainability | Inefficient algorithm, high complexity |
| Low | Style, minor improvement | Naming, documentation gaps |
Review Process
- Context: Understand what changed and why
- Scope: Identify all files to review
- Analysis: Examine each file systematically
- Evidence: Log commands and outputs used
- Report: Structure findings by severity
Subagents Available
pensive:code-reviewer- General code reviewpensive:architecture-reviewer- Design and pattern reviewpensive:rust-auditor- Rust-specific safety auditimbue:review-analyst- Formal review with evidence trails
Output Format
Produce structured reports with:
- Executive summary
- Findings by severity
- Evidence appendix
- Recommended actions
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 57 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A c386cfa279ca
code-review-mode is an agent published in the GitHub repository athola/claude-night-market (348 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 435 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
code-review-mode compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| code-review-modeathola/claude-night-market | Agent | 348 | today | MIT | A | 56 | Claude Code |
| 1-ceo-quality-control-agentccplugins/awesome-claude-code-plugins | Agent | 998 | 2mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 222 | Claude Code |
| audit-reviewerAleksandarBisevac/claude-plugins | Agent | 4 | today | MIT | A | 92 | Claude Code |
| audit-explorerAleksandarBisevac/claude-plugins | Agent | 4 | today | MIT | A | 72 | Claude Code |
| reviewerSatoruoGojoo/octopus | Agent | 2 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 65 | Claude Code |
| gatemarkskrypka/stem | Agent | 3 | 3mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 39 | Claude Code |
| review-reportermantacron/manta | Agent | 10 | 1mo ago | none | A | 100 | Claude Code |