Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to atmosware/praxia-agents. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/atmosware/praxia-agents/main/.claude/agents/praxia-test.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/atmosware/praxia-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/atmosware/praxia-agents/praxia-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/atmosware/praxia-agents/praxia-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/atmosware/praxia-agents/praxia-test.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.00125 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00063 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00025 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00013 |
Grade A, and why
praxia-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Canonical definition: Read
.github/agents/praxia-test.agent.mdand follow every instruction defined there exactly. This file exists only to register the agent — all role, responsibilities, constraints, approach, and output format are in the canonical file.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 7 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 7f70644c4ef8
praxia-test is an agent published in the GitHub repository atmosware/praxia-agents (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 125 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
tester
Test writing (unit, integration, e2e). Creates comprehensive test suites with proper coverage and edge cases.
test-gap-finder
Finds missing, weak, or stale test coverage in a diff. Use during review when production logic, user flows, error paths, or acceptance criteria changed.
test-engineer
Testing expert for .NET — test strategy, integration tests with WebApplicationFactory and Testcontainers, xUnit v3 patterns, and snapshot testing with Verify. Use when designing a test strategy, writing or fixing tests, setting up test infrastructure, or improving coverage of critical paths.
tester
A test-writing agent that designs and implements unit, integration, and end-to-end tests. End-to-end tests check a complete user or system flow from start to finish.
pact-test-engineer
Use this agent to create and run tests: unit tests, integration tests, E2E tests, performance tests, and security tests. Use after code implementation is complete.
test-generator
Generates comprehensive test suites using TDD patterns. Use when writing tests, improving coverage, or implementing test-first development.