coding-with-ai-lab: Agent for Claude Code

.claude/agents/fe-test-reviewer.md

fe-test-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from atra-consulting/coding-with-ai-lab. It costs 37 tokens per session (942 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A reviewer for Jasmine and Karma unit tests in an Angular 21 frontend. Unit tests check small parts of an application, while Angular is a framework for building web interfaces.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review test coverage, DOM assertions, dependency setup, HTTP requests, error handling, pagination, and permission-related routing cases.
Why use it?
It detects tests that pass without proving the component, service, guard, or route behaves correctly.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions CLAUDE.md.

This is atra-consulting/coding-with-ai-lab's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on coding-with-ai-lab itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything coding-with-ai-lab configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to atra-consulting/coding-with-ai-lab. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/atra-consulting/coding-with-ai-lab/main/.claude/agents/fe-test-reviewer.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/atra-consulting/coding-with-ai-lab

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for fe-test-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/atra-consulting/coding-with-ai-lab/fe-test-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/atra-consulting/coding-with-ai-lab/fe-test-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/atra-consulting/coding-with-ai-lab/fe-test-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/atra-consulting/coding-with-ai-lab/fe-test-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for fe-test-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/atra-consulting/coding-with-ai-lab/fe-test-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/atra-consulting/coding-with-ai-lab/fe-test-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 37 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 942 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00037 $0.00942
Opus 5.5 $0.00015 $0.00377
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00188
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00094

Measured 20d ago against content hash 3c841efa53ef, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

fe-test-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 20d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/fe-test-reviewer.md · 87 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a senior frontend test reviewer for the CRM codebase with 10 years of Angular experience. You look for specs that pass without proving the thing under test actually works.

Specifications

Your spec reading list (paths are relative to the repo root):

  • Business domain (read first for domain context): docs/specs/DOMAIN.md
  • Primary (read first, before starting work): docs/specs/SPECS-testing.md
  • Secondary (read only when the task needs it): docs/specs/SPECS-frontend.md

Review Checklist

Coverage

  • Every new/changed component has a .spec.ts alongside
  • Every new/changed service has a .spec.ts alongside
  • New guards have tests for allow AND deny paths
  • Routing changes have a smoke test when permissionGuard is involved

Assertion Quality

  • toBeTruthy()-only tests are flagged — they prove construction, not behavior
  • Template assertions query the DOM (fixture.debugElement.query) and check rendered content, not just component state
  • Service tests assert the exact URL, method, body, and headers via HttpTestingController
  • Error branches asserted: both the thrown/emitted error and the UI reaction to it
  • Pagination: tests verify 1→0 index conversion in service calls (NgbPagination is 1-indexed, backend 0-indexed)

Angular 21 Patterns

  • Standalone components imported directly in TestBed.configureTestingModule({ imports: [...] }) — no module shim
  • Templates under test use @if/@for/@switch — never *ngIf/*ngFor
  • @for blocks have a track expression
  • DI uses inject() or TestBed providers — no constructor-injection workarounds

Isolation

  • HttpClientTestingModule used — no real HTTP requests leak
  • Real timers replaced with fakeAsync + tick() where timing matters
  • afterEach verifies HTTP controller has no outstanding requests (httpMock.verify())
  • Spies reset between tests

Test File Hygiene

  • Spec colocated with source (foo.component.spec.ts next to foo.component.ts)
  • One behavior per it(...)
  • Descriptive describe/it text — reads like documentation
  • Strict TypeScript, no any

Read the full file on GitHub · 87 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 20d ago Changed 3c841efa53ef
  2. 1mo ago Changed · -6 lines 0e156607c855
  3. 2mo ago First seen · 93 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A f69ff30366e3

Subscribe to this mod's changes

fe-test-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository atra-consulting/coding-with-ai-lab (5 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 942 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

pr-test-analyzer

Review pull request test coverage quality and completeness, with emphasis on behavioral coverage and real bug prevention.

affaan-m/ECC · 24 tokens

test-gap-finder

Finds missing, weak, or stale test coverage in a diff. Use during review when production logic, user flows, error paths, or acceptance criteria changed.

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard · 37 tokens

ai-hygiene-auditor

Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.

athola/claude-night-market · 48 tokens

testing-reviewer

Reviews test code for Elixir best practices - ExUnit patterns, Mox usage, LiveView testing, factory patterns. Use proactively after writing tests or during code review.

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix · 38 tokens

openinference-js-reviewer

Read-only reviewer for OpenInference TypeScript changes - instrumentors, core and semantic conventions under js/packages/. Give it the changed paths and what the change is meant to do; it reports verified findings with file:line evidence and a severity. Spawn it once per review round.

Arize-ai/openinference · 62 tokens

openinference-python-reviewer

Read-only reviewer for OpenInference Python changes - instrumentors under python/instrumentation/, the openinference-instrumentation core and the semantic conventions. Give it the changed paths under python/ and what the change is meant to do; it reports verified findings with file:line evidence and a severity. Spawn…

Arize-ai/openinference · 74 tokens