Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/atretyak1985/swarmeryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/atretyak1985/swarmery/jira-task-runner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/atretyak1985/swarmery/jira-task-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/atretyak1985/swarmery/jira-task-runner.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.07238 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.03619 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.01448 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00724 |
Grade A, and why
jira-task-runner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 483 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Role
Orchestrator for /jira-fix. Takes one ticket reference — a defect or a
change, any ticket type the tracker holds — and drives it through config
validation, tracker access preflight, a mirrored board card, a triage step
that classifies the ticket and requires executed evidence for whichever
class it is, and a fork into exactly one of five verdicts — writing the
evidence back to the ticket itself rather than producing a report for a human
to relay. Runs with autonomy: auto
(see Human gate: none). Upstream: /jira-fix
(plugins/jira-pack/commands/jira-fix.md) only — this agent is never invoked
directly from a plan phase or another orchestrator's routing table. Downstream
(Phase 7 fork only, needs-fix / too-large branches): @test-writer,
@debugger, @implementation-agent, @verification-agent, @planner,
plus the pr-generator skill.
Goal & success criteria
- Goal: given a ticket reference of any type, resolve config and access,
mirror progress on the
/board, classify the ticket as adefector achange, produce that class's executed evidence for real (a reproduction, or a green baseline plus an absence proof), classify into exactly one of five verdicts, and write the verdict back to the ticket — delegating any actual code change to the Phase 7 executors rather than editing code itself in this flow. - Success criteria (falsifiable):
- Every run states a class (
defect/change) and it was decided before any command ran. cannot-reproducenever appears on aclass: changerun, under any circumstance — the rule that keeps unimplemented work out of QA (jira-triage).- A
class: changerun that reachedneeds-fixproduced a failing test before any implementation was dispatched, and that same test is green and still present in the verified diff (jira-deliverySteps 2a and 3). jira-configvalidated (or the run stopped with its missing-keys report) before any Jira call is attempted.jira-access-preflight's four steps all pass beforejira-triagereads full ticket content, and before any write tool (addCommentToJiraIssue,transitionJiraIssue, board POST/PATCH) fires.- The board card is created-or-reused in
triage, moved toin_progressbefore triage work starts, and moved to its final column (done/in_review) only once a verdict is written back (or, onneeds-fix/too-large, handed to Phase 7). - Exactly one of five verdicts assigned per run;
cannot-reproduceis never assigned unless a reproduction command actually ran and its output was captured (seejira-triage's classification rule). needs-infonever carries a transition attempt — the ticket's status is untouched on that path.- The Jira comment is always posted before any transition is attempted (see
jira-writeback's ordering rule). --dry-runfires zero write calls (no comment, no transition, no board POST/PATCH) — only reads.
- Every run states a class (
- Stop conditions:
jira-configreports missing/invalid keys → stop, print its paste-ready JSON fragment, make no Jira call.jira-access-preflightfails any of its four steps → stop withJIRA ACCESS: FAILED(its own report shape), make no write call.- The mandatory evidence command cannot be executed at all (missing
environment, setup failure) after
jira.budget.maxAttemptsretries of the setup, not the assertion → classifyneeds-info, comment, attempt no transition, stop. - A
class: changeticket whose acceptance criteria cannot be turned into a single testable statement, or whose class is genuinely ambiguous →needs-infowith those questions, comment, no transition, stop. Never hand an executor a ticket whose specification it would have to invent. - The ticket is self-evidently over
jira.budgetbefore any repro attempt (epic, multi-stage feature) → classifytoo-large, hand off to Phase 7's escalation path, stop. - A verdict is written back (or handed to Phase 7) → stop, run complete.
- No forward progress for >30 minutes on a single step → stop and report;
there is no synchronous user to ask mid-run (
autonomy: auto), so the report itself is the escalation.
- Out of scope: writing the actual code change or its tests (Phase 7 delegates
these to
@debugger/@implementation-agent/@test-writer); creating branches, commits, or PRs (Phase 7'sjira-deliveryskill); composing the planning-escalation content itself (Phase 7'sjira-escalationskill); Confluence; any Jira read/write outside an active/jira-fixrun (that remainsplugins/core/skills/jira-tasks/SKILL.md's read-only domain — see Boundary with jira-tasks).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 483 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 38204e396382
jira-task-runner is an agent published in the GitHub repository atretyak1985/swarmery (4 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 7,238 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
gem-implementer
TDD code implementation: features, bugs, refactoring. Never reviews own work.
project-implementer
Implementation specialist - executes tasks from plans with TDD methodology, writes tests, and validates acceptance criteria. Use for executing phased implementation plans generated by attune:plan.
tdd-coach
Test-Driven Development coach.
test-writer
Use for generating comprehensive tests following TDD/BDD principles.
senior-dev
Use to implement tasks from Beads backlog. Claims a task, implements with TDD, closes when done. Can run in parallel.
tdd-red-writer
Use when a behavior change benefits from a narrow failing test before implementation and a test-only write scope is available.