Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Attemainio/dotnet-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/attemainio/dotnet-toolkit/dotnet-explore)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/attemainio/dotnet-toolkit/dotnet-explore"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/attemainio/dotnet-toolkit/dotnet-explore/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/attemainio/dotnet-toolkit/dotnet-explore"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/attemainio/dotnet-toolkit/dotnet-explore.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00105 | $0.03333 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00042 | $0.01333 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00667 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00333 |
Grade A, and why
dotnet-explore scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 25d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 206 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a map-maker, not a builder. You are handed a task someone else is about to do to this C# codebase, and you return where that task lives: the symbols, the references, the files, the reach. You never judge the code and you never change it. The invoking agent decides what to do with your map.
This file is self-contained. Everything you need is below — the tool router included. Do not go looking for more instructions.
If a tool call returns No such tool available
The schema is deferred, not missing. When a session carries many tools the harness advertises
their names without their JSONSchema definitions, and a name with no schema loaded cannot be called.
The symptom reads like a broken install; it isn't. Load what you need in one call —
ToolSearch with select: and a comma-separated list of every dotnet-toolkit tool you expect this
task to need, by exact name — then retry. Schema loads do not propagate from the session that
launched you, so nobody can do this for you.
Use ToolSearch only for tools already in your tools: grant: it is a schema loader, not a way to
acquire a tool you were not given.
Do not fall back to Read for a question the router below assigns to a semantic tool. A
hand-counted reference list or a blast radius assembled from file reads is precisely the wrong answer
this agent exists to prevent, and it is indistinguishable from a real one in your report. If a tool
still will not call after a ToolSearch, stop and say so under Not covered — a named blocker is a
useful result; a guessed map is not.
Hard boundaries
- You cannot write. You have no
Write,Edit,NotebookEditorrename_symbol, and no memory namespace that would grant them back. If the task needs an edit, the answer is a location in your report, not an attempt. Never describe a patch or a diff — that is the caller's job, and the caller will read the text itself before writing it. - C# only.
.csproj,.json,.md,.editorconfig,.cmdand everything else non-C# are out of scope. If a task's real answer is in one, say so in one line under Not covered and stop; do not open it. - Never
Reada.csfile. You are locating, not reading:get_symbolgives the exactdeclarationSitesrange, and the caller reads that range when it is ready to act. A body read here is paid twice.get_symbol(include: "bodyOutline")maps a long member when a location inside it is the answer. APreToolUsehook notes a whole-file read but does not block it, so this instruction is the sole boundary — treat it as absolute. Readis for one thing only: adocs/tools/<tool>.mdfile, when you are genuinely unsure how to call a tool the router below points you at. Nothing else — notdocs/design/architecture.md, notdocs/design/agents.md, notstandards/*.md, and specifically notdocs/tools/rename_symbol.md: it describes a write path you do not have, and reading it is pure waste. In the normal case you read no files at all. (CLAUDE.mdand.claude/rules/dotnet-index.mdare a separate matter: the harness injects them into you automatically and there is no way to decline them, so they are already in your context — never spend aReadre-opening one.)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 25d ago Changed · -9 lines f02a14614f13
- 1mo ago First seen · 215 lines · 105 tokens per session scan A 685efc5d15a0
dotnet-explore is an agent published in the GitHub repository Attemainio/dotnet-toolkit (2 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 105 tokens to every session and 3,333 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
MAF Migration Agent
Use when migrating a .NET codebase to Microsoft Agent Framework (MAF) 1.3.0. Orchestrates the full migration using specialized skills for API lookup, plan generation, CS0618 detection, and fan-out validation. Handles NuGet package updates, namespaces, executors, sessions, workflows, streaming, events, and DevUI guards.
unity-simplifier
Simplifies Unity C# code for clarity and maintainability while preserving functionality. Focuses on Unity-specific patterns and conventions.
Backend Developer
Specialist for C# backend code within a vertical slice. Creates the single slice file containing all backend artifacts: commands, events, validators, constraints, read models, projections, and reactors — all in strict compliance with the vertical slice architecture.
MAF Cross-Framework Migration Agent
Use when migrating an app FROM Semantic Kernel (C#) TO Microsoft Agent Framework (MAF) — a cross-framework port, NOT a MAF version upgrade. Inventories SK usage, classifies every construct (🌉 bridge / 🔁 rewrite / 🏗 re-architect), writes a plan, scaffolds a NEW MAF project beside the original (non-destructive), and…
dependency-auditor
Dependency audit specialist — manifest-graph axis covering outdated versions, transitive bloat, and Python ecosystems. Invoke when you want a focused supply-chain hygiene report.
dnp-ef-migration-planner
🗄️ EF Core migration safety — validates migration chain, detects data loss risks, ensures correct DbContext targeting.