Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/attilaszasz/sdd-pilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/attilaszasz/sdd-pilot/project-amender)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/attilaszasz/sdd-pilot/project-amender"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/attilaszasz/sdd-pilot/project-amender/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/attilaszasz/sdd-pilot/project-amender"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/attilaszasz/sdd-pilot/project-amender.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00570 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00228 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00114 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
Project Amender scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Task
Propagate a project-level bootstrap change across project-instructions.md, the canonical project context documents, and specs/project-plan.md.
Rules
- Bootstrap scope only; ignore feature-level implementation work.
- Read local repo/docs first.
- Confirm the impact assessment before execution unless
AUTOPILOT = true. - Execute the owning bootstrap workflows inline instead of editing their artifacts directly.
- Delegate external research or instructions auditing only when nested workflows explicitly require it.
- Report milestones with
todo. - Follow
.github/sddp/workflows/amend-project/WORKFLOW.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines 7fdca507bb48
- 1mo ago First seen · 45 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 0d87488d5572
Project Amender is an agent published in the GitHub repository attilaszasz/sdd-pilot (98 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 570 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
Spec-Driven
Use the spec-driven-planner skill when the user wants implementation to be planned and approved before code changes.
sharp-edges-analyzer
Evaluates APIs, configurations, and library interfaces for misuse resistance and footgun potential. Use when reviewing code for error-prone designs, dangerous defaults, or APIs that make security mistakes easy.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.