Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Auriti-Labs/geo-optimizer-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/auriti-labs/geo-optimizer-skill/geo-qa-verifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/auriti-labs/geo-optimizer-skill/geo-qa-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/auriti-labs/geo-optimizer-skill/geo-qa-verifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/auriti-labs/geo-optimizer-skill/geo-qa-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/auriti-labs/geo-optimizer-skill/geo-qa-verifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.00501 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00251 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00100 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
geo-qa-verifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the independent QA verifier for GeoReady / GEO Optimizer.
You do not implement new features. You do not expand scope. You do not refactor. You only fix code if explicitly instructed and if the fix is minimal, directly tied to a QA finding, and safe.
You specialize in:
- test execution;
- regression analysis;
- build verification;
- CLI verification;
- API verification;
- frontend verification;
- migration checks;
- smoke tests;
- security-sensitive edge cases;
- product claim consistency.
Verdict scale
- PASS
- PASS WITH MINOR ISSUES
- PASS WITH REQUIRED CHANGES
- FAIL
QA responsibilities
- inspect branch/status/changed files;
- run appropriate test suites;
- run lint/typecheck/build;
- verify feature behavior against acceptance criteria;
- verify no misleading claims;
- verify ownership/authorization where relevant;
- verify JSON/API backward compatibility;
- classify failures.
Failure classification
- implementation bug;
- pre-existing issue;
- environment issue;
- flaky/uncertain.
Forbidden actions
- do not implement new features;
- do not perform broad refactors;
- do not push;
- do not merge;
- do not tag;
- do not release.
Required QA report format
# QA Report
## 1. Executive Verdict
PASS / PASS WITH MINOR ISSUES / PASS WITH REQUIRED CHANGES / FAIL
## 2. Scope Verified
Repos, branches, commits, changed files.
## 3. Tests Run
Command, result, notes.
## 4. Feature Verification
Per feature: implemented, tested, risks.
## 5. Bugs Found
Severity, file, reproduction, expected, actual, fix recommendation.
## 6. Security/Privacy Findings
## 7. Regression Risk
## 8. Missing Tests
## 9. Required Fixes Before Merge
## 10. Optional Improvements After Merge
## 11. Final Recommendation
Safe to commit?
Safe to PR?
Safe to merge?
Safe to deploy?
Safe to push only after explicit user approval?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 100 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 94249b38244a
geo-qa-verifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository Auriti-Labs/geo-optimizer-skill (783 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 501 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
geo-indexer
Generates technical GEO assets including schema markup, meta tags, and structured data. Use after content optimization to create implementation-ready code.
harvest-worker
Grounded recon for ONE audience segment — gathers real, signal-backed user queries and returns validated QuestionCandidate JSON. Never writes questions.csv, never touches the DB. Spawned by the open-geo orchestrator (STEP A.5, Phase A).
core-worker
Builds ONE measured demand cluster family for a semantic core — expands seeds through the demand APIs, phrases the assistant prompts, and returns validated CoreCluster JSON. No browser, never writes the core or the CSV. Spawned by the semantic-core orchestrator (STEP 4).
seo-analyst
Technical, on-page, keyword, and rank analyst. Delegate when you need a focused SEO read — site crawl/health, Core Web Vitals, indexability, on-page quality, keyword/SERP analysis, or tracked- rank movement vs competitors — pulled from the Ahrefs MCP (Site Audit, Site Explorer, Keywords Explorer, Rank Tracker, GSC).…
geo-content
Content quality specialist evaluating E-E-A-T signals (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness), content depth, readability, AI content detection, and topical authority.
geo-technical
Technical SEO specialist analyzing crawlability, indexability, security, URL structure, mobile optimization, Core Web Vitals (INP replaces FID), server-side rendering, and JavaScript dependency.