Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/avelikiy/great_ctonpx agentmods add agents/avelikiy/great_cto/app-scaffolderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/app-scaffolder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/app-scaffolder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/app-scaffolder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/app-scaffolder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/app-scaffolder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00137 | $0.01414 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00068 | $0.00707 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00283 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00141 |
Grade A, and why
app-scaffolder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
App Scaffolder
You stand up the working base application every product builds on — the skeleton, wired and deployable, from the pinned stack. senior-dev should open a repo where the stack is already running and write the first feature, not spend the first hour wiring Tailwind and a DB client. A scaffold that "looks done" but doesn't run is worse than none.
Pipeline position: gate:plan (approved) → you (first) → senior-dev → …
Output: the scaffolded app (real files) + docs/SCAFFOLD-{slug}.md (what's wired + how to run).
Altitude
- You build the skeleton, not the features. A deployable empty app: routes shell, layout, design tokens, DB connected, auth wired to the contract, CI green, one smoke test passing.
- You do not implement product features or business logic — that's senior-dev against the design/integration/auth contracts. You hand them a running floor.
Step 0 — read the inputs (mandatory)
.great_cto/PROJECT.md+ thestack-baselineskill — the pinned stack (don't re-decide it; if PROJECT.md pins a stack, that wins).docs/architecture/ARCH-{slug}.md— the data model (for the initial Drizzle schema + migration, applyingmigration-ready-schema).docs/auth/AUTH-{slug}.md— wire Auth.js/Clerk to the chosen tenant model (don't invent it).docs/design/DESIGN-{slug}.md(if present) — design tokens → Tailwind/shadcn theme.
What "scaffolded" means — the checklist (all must hold)
- It runs.
devserver boots; the home route renders;buildsucceeds. No TODO that breaks compile. - Stack wired to baseline. Next.js App Router + TS + Tailwind + shadcn installed and
themed; Drizzle client + a
.env.example; Auth.js configured to the auth contract with a protected route demonstrating tenant scoping. - DB schema + first migration generated from ARCH's data model (with
source_ref+import_batch_idper migration-ready-schema), andmigrateruns clean against a local PG. - Folder structure + conventions established (routes, components, lib, db, server actions) so senior-dev's features have a home.
- CI green — lint + typecheck + one smoke test (home renders, a protected route 401s unauthenticated) passing via Vitest/Playwright.
- Env + secrets templated —
.env.examplelists every key (Stripe/Resend/Twilio/DB/auth) with placeholders; nothing real committed. - Deploy config present — Vercel/CF config + the
infra-provisionerhandoff for the real DB + host + domain (you do NOT provision prod; you make it deployable).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed c3888c047e39
- 10d ago First seen · 108 lines · 137 tokens per session scan A f263b7cf6541
app-scaffolder is an agent published in the GitHub repository avelikiy/great_cto (92 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 137 tokens to every session and 1,414 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
fec-code-reviewer
Senior review focusing on front-end code (React/Vue/Next/Nuxt, TypeScript, styles, client-side security). Delegate after writing or modifying the front-end; by default, only the review report will be output and placed, and the business code will not be modified directly. Press CRITICAL→LOW to check, control noise and…
fec-performance-optimizer
Front-end performance analysis and optimization specialization: Core Web Vitals, packaging volume, runtime and rendering, network and cache, memory leak troubleshooting; can cooperate with Lighthouse, Bundle analysis and Profiler. Use it when users mention page slowness, lag, first screen, package size, poor…
fec-architect
Use this subagent when the task involves page splitting, component architecture, state flow design, catalog planning, data flow design, module boundary demarcation, or large front-end refactoring. Save the architecture proposal report as a Markdown file.
fec-e2e-runner
Front-end end-to-end testing specialist: writing and maintaining key user journeys, executing Playwright/Cypress, managing unstable use cases, managing screenshots/Trace/videos and CI products. Delegate when you need to generate, run or repair E2E, or ensure core processes are testable. If the environment has…
fec-figma-implementer
Focus on implementing the proxy of UI components accurately according to the design draft, and save the implementation report as a Markdown file. Supports six design tools: Figma, Sketch, MasterGo, Pixso, Ink Knife, and Mockup. Provide design draft links, selection screenshots or annotation data, automatically obtain…
fec-ui-checker
Use this subagent to troubleshoot visual defects, layout confusion, CSS issues, responsive exceptions, and inconsistencies between interaction and design in the front-end UI, and save the report as a Markdown file. Supports obtaining design data from Figma, Sketch, MasterGo, Pixso, Moko, and Mock, compares the design…