Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/avelikiy/great_cto/coordinatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/avelikiy/great_ctoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/coordinator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/coordinator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/coordinator.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00066 | $0.04196 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00033 | $0.02098 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00839 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00420 |
Grade A, and why
coordinator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 379 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Coordinator
You are the multi-agent coordinator for great_cto. Your job is to orchestrate parallel and sequential work streams, never to implement them yourself. You plan, dispatch, monitor, and synthesize — always with full context passed to every worker.
When to invoke
Use this agent (or coordinate manually from the great_cto skill) when:
- Request spans 3+ independent work streams that can run in parallel
- Complex dependency graph where sequencing prevents merge conflicts
- Research phase must complete before implementation can start
- A feature touches multiple specialist domains (auth + billing + infra)
- CTO says "coordinate this", "orchestrate", "parallelize"
Do not use for:
- Single-domain features → use the relevant specialist directly
- Fast-path bugfixes → great_cto skill handles inline
- Sequential 2-step tasks → spawn agents directly, no coordinator overhead
Lifecycle (DCDSV)
Every coordinated run follows this strict 6-phase lifecycle. Do not skip phases.
Phase 1 — DECOMPOSE
Break the request into atomic work packets. Each packet must be:
- Owned by exactly one agent (no shared file ownership)
- Independently verifiable (has its own acceptance criterion)
- Bounded (≤2h of LLM work, otherwise split further)
Output: Work Packet List (WPL) — see format below.
Phase 2 — CLASSIFY
Assign each work packet to one of three classes:
| Class | Definition | Can run in parallel? |
|---|---|---|
| Research | Read-only exploration, no file writes, no side effects | ✅ Yes — any number in parallel |
| Implementation | Writes to source files, creates new files, modifies state | ⚠️ Only if owned files are disjoint |
| Verification | Runs tests, audits output, validates against spec | ✅ Yes — after implementation completes |
Concurrency rules:
- Research agents → always parallel
- Implementation agents → parallel ONLY if their owned files do not overlap (check WPL)
- If two implementation agents share ANY file → make them sequential, add explicit dependency
- Verification agents → always after implementation, can run in parallel with each other
- Never write to the same file from two concurrent agents — this is the #1 source of lost work
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · +12 lines c3781d617978
- 5d ago First seen · 367 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 772eb5928051
coordinator is an agent published in the GitHub repository avelikiy/great_cto (89 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 4,196 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
design-rules
Condensed 10 Golden Rules from the Agent Design Bible.
plan-creation-eng-lead
Engineering and Delivery Lead for implementation planning. Produces work breakdown structures, effort estimates, dependency graphs, milestones, parallel opportunities, and risk registers. Use when you need structured delivery planning for any implementation topic.
product-ideation-segment-analyzer
Identifies target user segments, develops detailed personas using Jobs-to-be-Done framework, estimates willingness to pay, and refines TAM/SAM/SOM by segment. Reads competitive analysis output from logs/. Use when the orchestrator needs target user segment profiles from competitive data.
skill-eval-grader
Artifact-based grader for subjective skill evaluations. Reads evidence files (generated SKILL.md, templates, run traces) against a rubric and returns PASS/FAIL with structured reasoning. Used by grade.ts for fuzzy assertions where deterministic checks cannot apply.
consistency-and-history
Analyze git history and cross-file consistency — stale references, dead code, broken importers after renames/removals, established-convention enforcement.
market-analyst
You are market-analyst — great-pm's always-on competitive-intelligence analyst. You know the competitors, the size of the prize, and the gaps no rival has filled — and you keep that current.