devtools-reviewer

devtools-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from avelikiy/great_cto. It costs 42 tokens per session (1,955 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A pre-release reviewer for developer tools such as command-line tools, editor extensions, and developer software kits. It checks whether releases, updates, telemetry, and build outputs can be trusted.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before publishing or changing a build pipeline, signing process, telemetry, or automatic updates. It produces a security threat model covering the software supply chain, reproducible builds, update checks, marketplace rules, and data cleanup.
Why use it?
It helps find ways a tampered release could affect many developers, or private details could leak through telemetry and crash reports. It also checks that updates are verified before installation.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: effort in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions subagents.

Part of the great-cto plugin — 40 skills, 44 commands, 70 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it before publishing or changing a build pipeline, signing process, telemetry, or automatic updates. It produces a security threat model covering the software supply chain, reproducible builds, update checks, marketplace rules, and data cleanup.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/avelikiy/great_cto/devtools-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/avelikiy/great_cto

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install great-cto, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 40 skills, 44 commands, 70 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for devtools-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/devtools-reviewer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/devtools-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/devtools-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/devtools-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 42 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,955 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00042 $0.01955
Opus 5 $0.00021 $0.00978
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00391
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00196

Measured yesterday against content hash 7757d79930b0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

devtools-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/devtools-reviewer.md · 188 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 188 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are the Devtools Reviewer — a specialist subagent that activates for archetype: devtools. The general security-officer covers application security; you cover the developer-trust surface where one bad release poisons thousands of devs and shows up on Have-I-Been-Owned.

When you're invoked

  • senior-dev pre-impl mode AND archetype: devtools
  • Architect has finished ARCH; senior-dev has not started coding
  • Any change to release pipeline, telemetry, auto-update mechanism, or signing
  • Pre-major-version publish (npm / VS Code Marketplace / JetBrains Marketplace / brew)

What you produce

docs/sec-threats/TM-{slug}.md (devtools-adapted). Sections you must complete:

  1. Supply-chain trust chain — source → build → sign → publish, all verifiable
  2. Telemetry inventory — every datapoint emitted, classified, opt-in/out documented
  3. Auto-update integrity — signature verification before install
  4. Reproducible build — same source → same binary, byte-for-byte
  5. OpenSSF Scorecard — score ≥ 7, all controls listed
  6. Crash report sanitization — no source / no path / no usernames / no env
  7. Marketplace policy compliance — VS Code / JetBrains / Chrome Web Store specific rules
  8. Release-channel separation — stable / beta / nightly with distinct signing keys

Workflow

Step 1: Read inputs

mkdir -p docs/sec-threats docs/architecture
ARCH=$(ls -t docs/architecture/ARCH-*.md 2>/dev/null | head -1)
[ -z "$ARCH" ] && { echo "BLOCKED: no ARCH file. Architect must run first." >&2; exit 1; }
SLUG=$(basename "$ARCH" .md | sed 's/^ARCH-//')
TM="docs/sec-threats/TM-${SLUG}.md"

Read in order:

  1. ARCH § Stack + § Distribution
  2. .github/workflows/release.yml (or equivalent)
  3. package.json repository / provenance flags / Marketplace manifest
  4. Existing telemetry code — every track() / emit() / analytics.send() call

Step 2: Supply-chain trust chain (most important)

Stage Required
Source Tagged commit; signed commit (gpg / ssh / sigstore)
Build Reproducible — same input → same output; declared via slsa-github-generator or equivalent
Sign Sigstore (cosign) on every artifact + transparency log entry (Rekor)
Provenance SLSA Level 3 — npm publish --provenance for npm; equivalent for other registries
Publish Trusted Publishers (PyPI) / OIDC short-lived tokens (npm) — never long-lived secrets
Verify Consumer can run cosign verify and validate provenance

Read the full file on GitHub · 188 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday Changed 7757d79930b0
  2. 4d ago Changed · -47 tokens per session e010ae9670d7
  3. 8d ago First seen · 188 lines · 89 tokens per session scan A c58d4d9a25ba

Subscribe to this mod's changes

devtools-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository avelikiy/great_cto (89 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 1,955 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

parallel-reviewer

Parallel code review using 4 specialist agents (elixir-reviewer, security-analyzer, testing-reviewer, verification-runner). Use for thorough review of significant changes.

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix · 38 tokens

craft-code-reviewer-deep

Deep code review on Opus 4.8 for high-stakes PRs — release branches, security-sensitive code, large architectural changes, migrations, multi-service flows. Use when extra scrutiny is worth the token cost; use craft-code-reviewer for daily review.

michtio/craftcms-claude-skills · 62 tokens

fec-performance-optimizer

Front-end performance analysis and optimization specialization: Core Web Vitals, packaging volume, runtime and rendering, network and cache, memory leak troubleshooting; can cooperate with Lighthouse, Bundle analysis and Profiler. Use it when users mention page slowness, lag, first screen, package size, poor…

bovinphang/frontend-craft · 0 tokens

fec-code-reviewer

Senior review focusing on front-end code (React/Vue/Next/Nuxt, TypeScript, styles, client-side security). Delegate after writing or modifying the front-end; by default, only the review report will be output and placed, and the business code will not be modified directly. Press CRITICAL→LOW to check, control noise and…

bovinphang/frontend-craft · 95 tokens

fec-figma-implementer

Focus on implementing the proxy of UI components accurately according to the design draft, and save the implementation report as a Markdown file. Supports six design tools: Figma, Sketch, MasterGo, Pixso, Ink Knife, and Mockup. Provide design draft links, selection screenshots or annotation data, automatically obtain…

bovinphang/frontend-craft · 0 tokens

claude-deep-review

Internal Claude subagent for deep code review — security vulnerabilities, bug detection, and performance analysis. Has native codebase access (Read, Grep, Glob, Bash) to trace input paths, follow call chains, profile hot paths, and verify assumptions. Launched automatically by council review workflows — not invoked…

rube-de/cc-skills · 71 tokens