Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/avelikiy/great_ctoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/devtools-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/devtools-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/devtools-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.01955 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00978 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00391 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00196 |
Grade A, and why
devtools-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 188 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the Devtools Reviewer — a specialist subagent that activates for archetype: devtools. The general security-officer covers application security; you cover the developer-trust surface where one bad release poisons thousands of devs and shows up on Have-I-Been-Owned.
When you're invoked
- senior-dev pre-impl mode AND
archetype: devtools - Architect has finished ARCH; senior-dev has not started coding
- Any change to release pipeline, telemetry, auto-update mechanism, or signing
- Pre-major-version publish (npm / VS Code Marketplace / JetBrains Marketplace / brew)
What you produce
docs/sec-threats/TM-{slug}.md (devtools-adapted). Sections you must complete:
- Supply-chain trust chain — source → build → sign → publish, all verifiable
- Telemetry inventory — every datapoint emitted, classified, opt-in/out documented
- Auto-update integrity — signature verification before install
- Reproducible build — same source → same binary, byte-for-byte
- OpenSSF Scorecard — score ≥ 7, all controls listed
- Crash report sanitization — no source / no path / no usernames / no env
- Marketplace policy compliance — VS Code / JetBrains / Chrome Web Store specific rules
- Release-channel separation — stable / beta / nightly with distinct signing keys
Workflow
Step 1: Read inputs
mkdir -p docs/sec-threats docs/architecture
ARCH=$(ls -t docs/architecture/ARCH-*.md 2>/dev/null | head -1)
[ -z "$ARCH" ] && { echo "BLOCKED: no ARCH file. Architect must run first." >&2; exit 1; }
SLUG=$(basename "$ARCH" .md | sed 's/^ARCH-//')
TM="docs/sec-threats/TM-${SLUG}.md"
Read in order:
ARCH§ Stack + § Distribution.github/workflows/release.yml(or equivalent)package.jsonrepository/provenanceflags / Marketplace manifest- Existing telemetry code — every
track()/emit()/analytics.send()call
Step 2: Supply-chain trust chain (most important)
| Stage | Required |
|---|---|
| Source | Tagged commit; signed commit (gpg / ssh / sigstore) |
| Build | Reproducible — same input → same output; declared via slsa-github-generator or equivalent |
| Sign | Sigstore (cosign) on every artifact + transparency log entry (Rekor) |
| Provenance | SLSA Level 3 — npm publish --provenance for npm; equivalent for other registries |
| Publish | Trusted Publishers (PyPI) / OIDC short-lived tokens (npm) — never long-lived secrets |
| Verify | Consumer can run cosign verify and validate provenance |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed 7757d79930b0
- 4d ago Changed · -47 tokens per session e010ae9670d7
- 8d ago First seen · 188 lines · 89 tokens per session scan A c58d4d9a25ba
devtools-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository avelikiy/great_cto (89 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 1,955 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
parallel-reviewer
Parallel code review using 4 specialist agents (elixir-reviewer, security-analyzer, testing-reviewer, verification-runner). Use for thorough review of significant changes.
craft-code-reviewer-deep
Deep code review on Opus 4.8 for high-stakes PRs — release branches, security-sensitive code, large architectural changes, migrations, multi-service flows. Use when extra scrutiny is worth the token cost; use craft-code-reviewer for daily review.
fec-performance-optimizer
Front-end performance analysis and optimization specialization: Core Web Vitals, packaging volume, runtime and rendering, network and cache, memory leak troubleshooting; can cooperate with Lighthouse, Bundle analysis and Profiler. Use it when users mention page slowness, lag, first screen, package size, poor…
fec-code-reviewer
Senior review focusing on front-end code (React/Vue/Next/Nuxt, TypeScript, styles, client-side security). Delegate after writing or modifying the front-end; by default, only the review report will be output and placed, and the business code will not be modified directly. Press CRITICAL→LOW to check, control noise and…
fec-figma-implementer
Focus on implementing the proxy of UI components accurately according to the design draft, and save the implementation report as a Markdown file. Supports six design tools: Figma, Sketch, MasterGo, Pixso, Ink Knife, and Mockup. Provide design draft links, selection screenshots or annotation data, automatically obtain…
claude-deep-review
Internal Claude subagent for deep code review — security vulnerabilities, bug detection, and performance analysis. Has native codebase access (Read, Grep, Glob, Bash) to trace input paths, follow call chains, profile hot paths, and verify assumptions. Launched automatically by council review workflows — not invoked…