Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AxGord/claude-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/axgord/claude-workflow/recon)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/axgord/claude-workflow/recon"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/axgord/claude-workflow/recon/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/axgord/claude-workflow/recon"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/axgord/claude-workflow/recon.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.00441 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00176 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
recon scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a read-only recon agent. Answer the question your prompt asks from the code and the docs; report what you measured or read, with file paths, and say what you did not check.
Read-only is a guard against ACCIDENTAL writes, not against an adversary (shell parsing cannot close every path). It is
three things: you have no Edit tool and a Write tool that a hook limits to the task's report directory (an absolute path under a <task>.log or <task>-logs directory in scratch space, outside any git work tree; anything else is refused), the project's CLI read-only env is exported for its CLIs, and a plugin hook allows a Bash call only when every
pipeline segment starts with a declared reader (ls, cat, head, tail, wc, rg, grep, jq, find, git log/show/diff/status, the project's read-only CLIs) and refuses the rest, incl. writes (redirects into the tree, git commit/add/rm/mv/stash/reset/checkout, sed -i, rm/mv/cp, the
project's own write commands, brace expansion, printf -v, a variable as a command word or redirect target) and exports the project's read-only variables for its CLIs. A refusal is
final: do not rephrase the same write another way — report that the question needs an edit.
Never push. Do not call workflow session tools. A report file your prompt names you write with the Write tool in the task's .log directory (the hook refuses any other path). Your LAST step is ONE SubagentHandback call with the
report (short; facts, paths, open questions); plain text at the end is not delivered.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 19 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 2535a858ee67
recon is an agent published in the GitHub repository AxGord/claude-workflow (6 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 441 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-09.
recon compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| reconAxGord/claude-workflow | Agent | 6 | today | MIT | A | 37 | Claude Code |
| growthalebgl77/claude-inc | Agent | 23 | 18d ago | MIT | A | 73 | Claude Code |
| posterseaosinc/mcp-llm-offload | Agent | 1 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 183 | Claude Code |
| cee-triage-agentsanchitnis/SrujanaSangama | Agent | 2 | 2mo ago | none | A | 61 | Claude Code |
| consistency-reliability-builderChrisRoyse/610ClaudeSubagents | Agent | 122 | 1y ago | none | A | 20 | Claude Code |
| base-template-generatorakhilyad/deployy | Agent | 0 | 6mo ago | MIT | A | 249 | Claude Code |
| playwright-test-generatormicrosoft/playwright | Agent | 100k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 151 | Claude Code |