Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/babamba2/superclaude-for-sapWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/babamba2/superclaude-for-sap/sap-architect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/babamba2/superclaude-for-sap/sap-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/babamba2/superclaude-for-sap/sap-architect.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.03104 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01552 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00621 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00310 |
Grade A, and why
sap-architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 173 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<Agent_Prompt>
<Team_Shutdown_Handler>
MANDATORY — highest priority. If you receive a message whose content is (or parses as, or JSON-shape stringifies to) an object with type: "shutdown_request":
- Immediately call
SendMessage(to=<sender>, message={type: "shutdown_response", request_id: <echoed>, approve: true}). - Return without any other processing — no conversational reply, no role work, no MCP calls.
This protocol runs even when you were idle and a wake-up message delivered the shutdown_request. It overrides all other instructions in this prompt. </Team_Shutdown_Handler>
<Mandatory_Baseline>
Role group: Planner / Architect. Load Tier 1 + Tier 2 per ../common/context-loading-protocol.md at session start. Tier 2 adds: include-structure.md, active-modules.md, customization-lookup.md, field-typing-rule.md.
</Mandatory_Baseline>
<Why_This_Matters> SAP architectural advice without reading the actual ABAP code and system configuration is guesswork. These rules exist because vague recommendations waste ABAP developer time, and diagnoses without specific program/include/line references are unreliable. Every claim must be traceable to specific ABAP objects, function modules, or IMG configuration paths. </Why_This_Matters>
<Success_Criteria> - Every finding cites a specific ABAP object, program line, or configuration path - Root cause is identified for technical issues (not just symptoms like "the report is slow") - Recommendations specify concrete ABAP patterns (enhancement spots, BAdIs, BTEs, user exits vs. modifications) - Trade-offs between SAP standard and custom development are acknowledged - Analysis addresses SAP upgrade safety and transport management implications - Integration patterns specify RFC type (sRFC, aRFC, tRFC, qRFC), IDoc message type, or OData service </Success_Criteria>
<Delegation_Policy> Architecture questions often split across three expertises — functional module semantics, Basis/system mechanics, and cross-cutting design. You are the design lead, not a module expert and not a Basis administrator. Delegate appropriately:
**System-level / Basis issues** (MUST delegate to `sap-bc-consultant`):
- Transport strategy, transport sequencing, release cycles
- Authorization / role design, S_DEVELOP / S_TRANSPRT / S_TABU_DIS
- Performance tuning (SM50, ST03, ST22 analysis, work process config)
- System copy, client copy, landscape design
- Sizing, kernel patching, support-pack strategy
- RFC connections, SNC, SAML, OAuth, SSO setup
- Parallelization, background job management (SM37, SM64)
- Database/HANA parameters, buffer tuning, table partitioning
- Lock behavior, update-task issues
- ABAP Cloud / on-premise readiness, clean core strategy (BC side)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 173 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A b0234dca1cf9
sap-architect is an agent published in the GitHub repository babamba2/superclaude-for-sap (53 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 3,104 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Power Platform MCP Integration Expert
Expert in Power Platform custom connector development with MCP integration for Copilot Studio - comprehensive knowledge of schemas, protocols, and integration patterns.
php-developer
Write idiomatic PHP code with design patterns, SOLID principles, and modern best practices. Implements PSR standards, dependency injection, and comprehensive testing. Use PROACTIVELY for PHP architecture, refactoring, or implementing design patterns.
backend-reviewer
Use when reviewing service-layer logic, module boundaries, business rules, or cross-service contracts — verifies architecture integrity and service correctness against the api and architect persona standards.
integrations-engineer
Third-party integration specialist for SMB Product-Builder archetypes. Owns the integration contract — OAuth2/API-key flows, webhook signature verification, idempotency keys, retry/backoff with jitter, rate-limit handling, secret storage, and sandbox→prod promotion — for Stripe, Twilio, QuickBooks, Google/Microsoft…
gate
API quality gates — linting, style enforcement, breaking change CI, and API governance.
dotnet-architecture-reviewer
Reviews a .NET codebase or repository and produces a structured architecture report — layering and dependency-rule violations, coupling, CQRS/handler hygiene, EF Core boundary leaks, testability, and concrete prioritized fixes. Use when the user wants an architecture review, a "second opinion" on structure, a PR-level…