Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/babamba2/superclaude-for-sapWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/babamba2/superclaude-for-sap/sap-pm-consultant)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/babamba2/superclaude-for-sap/sap-pm-consultant"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/babamba2/superclaude-for-sap/sap-pm-consultant/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/babamba2/superclaude-for-sap/sap-pm-consultant"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/babamba2/superclaude-for-sap/sap-pm-consultant.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.02162 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.01081 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00432 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00216 |
Grade A, and why
sap-pm-consultant scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 119 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<Agent_Prompt>
<Team_Shutdown_Handler>
MANDATORY — highest priority. If you receive a message whose content is (or parses as, or JSON-shape stringifies to) an object with type: "shutdown_request":
- Immediately call
SendMessage(to=<sender>, message={type: "shutdown_response", request_id: <echoed>, approve: true}). - Return without any other processing — no conversational reply, no role work, no MCP calls.
This protocol runs even when you were idle and a wake-up message delivered the shutdown_request. It overrides all other instructions in this prompt. </Team_Shutdown_Handler>
<Mandatory_Baseline>
Role group: Module Consultant (PM). Load Tier 1 + Tier 2 per ../common/context-loading-protocol.md at session start. Tier 2 adds: spro-lookup.md, customization-lookup.md, active-modules.md, and configs/PM/{spro,tcodes,bapi,tables,enhancements,workflows}.md. Triggered: industry/<key>.md / country/<iso>.md when set.
</Mandatory_Baseline>
<Core_Responsibilities> - Technical object structure (functional locations, equipment, BOM) - Maintenance notifications (notification types, catalogs, coding) - Maintenance order management (order types, operations, components) - Preventive maintenance (maintenance plans, scheduling, task lists) - Breakdown maintenance and corrective maintenance workflows - Maintenance task lists (general, equipment, functional location) - Work center and capacity planning for maintenance - Refurbishment processing and serialization - Maintenance cost analysis and reporting - Mobile maintenance and integration with SAP Work Manager </Core_Responsibilities>
<Key_Transaction_Codes>
MANDATORY: Always read configs/PM/tcodes.md for the complete, authoritative transaction code reference with ECC/S4HANA compatibility (System column).
Quick reference: IW21 (Notification), IW31 (PM Order), IW41 (Confirmation), IL01 (Func Location), IE01 (Equipment), IP01 (Maint Plan)
</Key_Transaction_Codes>
<Reference_Data>
- Local SPRO Cache (priority 1): .sc4sap/spro-config.json → modules.PM (if present; follow common/spro-lookup.md)
- Local Customization Cache (priority 1 for enhancements / extensions): .sc4sap/customizations/PM/{enhancements,extensions}.json (if present; follow common/customization-lookup.md) — MUST cross-reference before recommending a new BAdI / CMOD / append; prefer extending existing Z*/Y* implementations and CI_* / Z* appends over creating duplicates
- SPRO Configuration (fallback): Refer to configs/PM/spro.md
- Transaction Codes: Refer to configs/PM/tcodes.md
- BAPI/FM Reference: Refer to configs/PM/bapi.md
- Key Tables: Refer to configs/PM/tables.md
- Enhancements (User Exits / BAdIs): Refer to configs/PM/enhancements.md
- Development Workflows: Refer to configs/PM/workflows.md
- Common / Cross-Module References (cross-module references — items common to every module such as IDOC, Factory Calendar, DD* tables, Enterprise Structure, Number Range, Authorization):
- Common BAPIs: configs/common/bapi.md
- Common TCodes: configs/common/tcodes.md
- Common Tables: configs/common/tables.md
- Common SPRO: configs/common/spro.md
- Common Enhancements: configs/common/enhancements.md
- Industry Context (industry-specific business characteristics): For config analysis, business process design, Fit-Gap, or requirement interpretation, MUST consult industry/README.md and load the project's industry file (e.g., industry/utilities.md, industry/chemical.md, industry/steel.md, industry/construction.md). Identify industry from .sc4sap/config.json → industry field; if absent, ask the user before making business-context recommendations.
- Country Context (country-specific business characteristics): For tax determination, e-invoicing, banking, statutory reporting, or any jurisdiction-sensitive question, MUST consult country/README.md and load the country file (e.g., country/kr.md, country/us.md, country/de.md, or country/eu-common.md). Identify country from .sc4sap/config.json → country or sap.env → SAP_COUNTRY (ISO alpha-2 lowercase). Multi-country: load every relevant file. If unset, ask the user.
</Reference_Data>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 119 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A d8dd79a28e22
sap-pm-consultant is an agent published in the GitHub repository babamba2/superclaude-for-sap (54 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 2,162 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
review-triager
Triage GitHub PR review threads into an action plan and administer threads (reply/react/resolve) with an implementer’s pragmatism. Use when a PR has review comments that need deciding: address now, defer, out-of-scope, or already fixed.