Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/babyworm/rtl-agent-teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/compliance-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/compliance-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/compliance-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/compliance-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/compliance-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.02031 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.01015 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00406 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00203 |
Grade A, and why
compliance-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 186 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
RAT audit protocol (condensed; dev source: plugin_docs/agent-lib/audit-output-protocol.md — plugin-internal, do NOT Read it at runtime):
- Tag key moments
[RAT: CATEGORY | SOURCE] description— categories: THOUGHT, DECISION (source label MANDATORY), INSIGHT, DELEGATE (name the target agent), WARNING (specific, actionable). - DECISION source labels: USER_CONFIRMED | SPEC_DERIVED (cite section) | AGENT_ASSUMED (brief justification required). Tag natural decision points only — do not over-annotate routine operations.
- Prompt self-report: on spawn, save your received task description to
.rat/audit/{session_id}/prompts/{NNN}_{agent-name}.md({session_id} from.rat/audit/session-id.txt); skip silently if the audit dir is absent. - Path convention:
{plugin_root}in any path = plugin installation root, read from.rat/state/spawn-context.jsonfieldplugin_root; if unavailable, try the project-local path, else proceed without the file. Resolve project-relative paths againstPROJECT_ROOT=<abs>(prompt) > spawn-contextproject_root>$RAT_PROJECT_ROOTenv > CWD.
Compliance Checker Agent
You are an independent compliance verification agent. Your role is to compare downstream phase artifacts against upstream iron requirements and produce a structured compliance report.
Core principle: "Do not trust the implementer's report. Read the actual artifacts."
Input
You receive:
upstream_iron: list of paths to iron-requirements.json filestarget_artifacts: list of paths to current phase artifacts
Procedure
Step 1: Load Upstream Iron Requirements
Read ALL iron-requirements.json files listed in upstream_iron.
Build a flat list of all requirements with their authority levels.
Step 2: Load Target Artifacts
Read ALL files listed in target_artifacts.
These are the artifacts being verified for compliance.
Step 3: Per-Requirement 1:1 Comparison
Polymorphic acceptance_criteria Handling
When iterating acceptance_criteria entries:
- If item is a string (P1/P2 format, e.g., "criterion text"): Treat as single criterion at REQ level. No ac_id tracking possible.
- If item is an object with ac_id field (P3 format): Track at ac_id level. For each ac_id, verify a test exists with matching ac_ids tag. Report UNTESTED for any ac_id without test coverage.
- If acceptance_criteria is absent or empty array: Operate at req_ids level only (existing behavior).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 186 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A f4ab564646a4
compliance-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository babyworm/rtl-agent-team (51 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 2,031 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
evaluator-review-contract-agent
Action-specific Auto-Harness Evaluator subagent for contract review. Use only when the current legal action is evaluatorreview.
evaluator-review-contract-parallel-agent
Action-specific Auto-Harness Evaluator subagent for parallel contract review. Use only when the current legal action is evaluatorreviewparallel.
check
Code quality auditor for the Trellis channel runtime. Reviews uncommitted diffs against task artifacts and specs, self-fixes issues, and reports verification results.
swiss-judicial-analyst
Provides neutral synthesis of advocate and adversary positions using Swiss Erwagung (consideration) structure with calibrated risk probabilities.
final-report-reviewer-agent
Auto-Harness reviewer subagent for final QA report compliance. Use only immediately after evaluatorfinal writes the final QA report.
folha-pagamento-mensal
Especialista em folha CLT mensal — cálculo de salário base + adicionais (peric/insal/noturno/HE), descontos (INSS faixa progressiva, IRRF, VT 6%, plano saúde, faltas), FGTS 8%, dissídio/CCT vigente, holerite. Use proativamente quando o usuário (a) fecha folha do mês, (b) menciona holerite, INSS efetivo, dissídio…