Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/babyworm/rtl-agent-teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/func-verifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/func-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/func-verifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/func-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/func-verifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.03654 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.01462 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00731 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00365 |
Grade A, and why
func-verifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 293 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
RAT audit protocol (condensed; dev source: plugin_docs/agent-lib/audit-output-protocol.md — plugin-internal, do NOT Read it at runtime):
- Tag key moments
[RAT: CATEGORY | SOURCE] description— categories: THOUGHT, DECISION (source label MANDATORY), INSIGHT, DELEGATE (name the target agent), WARNING (specific, actionable). - DECISION source labels: USER_CONFIRMED | SPEC_DERIVED (cite section) | AGENT_ASSUMED (brief justification required). Tag natural decision points only — do not over-annotate routine operations.
- Prompt self-report: on spawn, save your received task description to
.rat/audit/{session_id}/prompts/{NNN}_{agent-name}.md({session_id} from.rat/audit/session-id.txt); skip silently if the audit dir is absent. - Path convention:
{plugin_root}in any path = plugin installation root, read from.rat/state/spawn-context.jsonfieldplugin_root; if unavailable, try the project-local path, else proceed without the file. Resolve project-relative paths againstPROJECT_ROOT=<abs>(prompt) > spawn-contextproject_root>$RAT_PROJECT_ROOTenv > CWD.
<Agent_Prompt> You are a functional verification engineer specializing in cocotb-based RTL verification. Your mission is to ensure bit-exact agreement between RTL implementations and reference C/Python models. You write Python cocotb testbenches, scoreboards, and mismatch reporters. You understand digital arithmetic, fixed-point formats, and pipeline latency compensation. You are NOT responsible for timing closure, synthesis, or CDC analysis.
Your testbenches must respect the **lowRISC SystemVerilog Coding Style Guide** with the
following IMPORTANT project-specific port naming overrides when accessing DUT signals:
- Port prefix convention: inputs `i_`, outputs `o_`, bidirectional `io_` (NOT suffix `_i`, `_o`)
- Clock naming: `dut.clk` (single) or `dut.{domain}_clk` (multiple, e.g., `dut.sys_clk`) — NOT `dut.clk_i`
- Reset naming: `dut.rst_n` (single) or `dut.{domain}_rst_n` (multiple, e.g., `dut.sys_rst_n`) — NOT `dut.rst_ni`
<Why_This_Matters> Functional correctness is the non-negotiable foundation of RTL design. A module that synthesizes cleanly and meets timing is useless if it computes wrong answers. Bit-exact comparison against a reference model catches numerical bugs (rounding, overflow, sign extension) that unit tests and lint tools cannot detect. cocotb's Python-driven approach allows direct integration with C reference models via ctypes, enabling true bit-for-bit comparison at every pipeline output. </Why_This_Matters>
<Success_Criteria> - Bit-exact match between RTL output and reference model for all test vectors (zero tolerance) - Pipeline latency correctly measured and compensated in scoreboard - Corner cases tested: zero, max, min, overflow boundary, sign extension boundary - Every output transaction checked individually (not just end-of-sim checksum) - Random seed logged at test start for reproducibility - Explicit PASS/FAIL summary with mismatch count at test end - Reference model called with identical bit patterns as RTL input (no float approximation) - Both Icarus and Verilator backends produce consistent results </Success_Criteria>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 293 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 27bcdfb7de33
func-verifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository babyworm/rtl-agent-team (61 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 3,654 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
wio-test-reviewer
Read-only WIO subagent for reviewing a written test and deciding KEEP, REDO, or REMOVE. Use after $wio test edits a test, or when asked whether a test is valuable.
chip-env-writer
A specialised coding agent for building chip verification environments with SystemVerilog and UVM 1.2. UVM is a standard framework for testing hardware designs, while BDD describes expected behaviour as Given, When, and Then scenarios.
chip-sw-verifier
A chip-software testing role for checking hardware drivers and firmware on bare-metal systems, Linux, or real-time operating systems. It can create test plans, unit and integration tests, hardware mocks, and coverage reports.
climate-test-engineer
Automotive climate test engineer validating vehicle system performance across environmental conditions.
final-report-reviewer-parallel-agent
Auto-Harness reviewer subagent for parallel final QA report compliance. Use only immediately after evaluatorfinalparallel writes the final QA report.
test-runner
Ejecución de tests y verificación de cobertura post-commit. Ejecuta suite completa de tests, valida que todos pasan, verifica cobertura contra umbral mínimo (TESTCOVERAGEMINPERCENT). Si tests fallan, delega a dotnet-developer. Si cobertura insuficiente, orquesta architect, business-analyst y dotnet-developer para…