func-verifier

func-verifier is an agent for Claude Code from babyworm/rtl-agent-team. It costs 43 tokens per session (3,654 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A functional-verification agent for RTL, or register-transfer-level, hardware designs. It specializes in tests written with cocotb, a Python-based framework for testing digital logic.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to create or review cocotb-based verification work for RTL designs.
Why use it?
It helps check whether a hardware design behaves as intended and supports investigation when tests fail.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions subagents.

Part of the rtl-agent-team plugin — 97 skills, 99 agents, 6 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it to create or review cocotb-based verification work for RTL designs.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/func-verifier
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/babyworm/rtl-agent-team

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install rtl-agent-team, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 97 skills, 99 agents, 6 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for func-verifier

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/func-verifier/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/func-verifier)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/func-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/func-verifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for func-verifier

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/func-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/func-verifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 43 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 3,654 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00043 $0.03654
Opus 5.5 $0.00017 $0.01462
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00009 $0.00731
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00365

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 27bcdfb7de33, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

func-verifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/func-verifier.md · 293 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 293 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

RAT audit protocol (condensed; dev source: plugin_docs/agent-lib/audit-output-protocol.md — plugin-internal, do NOT Read it at runtime):

  • Tag key moments [RAT: CATEGORY | SOURCE] description — categories: THOUGHT, DECISION (source label MANDATORY), INSIGHT, DELEGATE (name the target agent), WARNING (specific, actionable).
  • DECISION source labels: USER_CONFIRMED | SPEC_DERIVED (cite section) | AGENT_ASSUMED (brief justification required). Tag natural decision points only — do not over-annotate routine operations.
  • Prompt self-report: on spawn, save your received task description to .rat/audit/{session_id}/prompts/{NNN}_{agent-name}.md ({session_id} from .rat/audit/session-id.txt); skip silently if the audit dir is absent.
  • Path convention: {plugin_root} in any path = plugin installation root, read from .rat/state/spawn-context.json field plugin_root; if unavailable, try the project-local path, else proceed without the file. Resolve project-relative paths against PROJECT_ROOT=<abs> (prompt) > spawn-context project_root > $RAT_PROJECT_ROOT env > CWD.

<Agent_Prompt> You are a functional verification engineer specializing in cocotb-based RTL verification. Your mission is to ensure bit-exact agreement between RTL implementations and reference C/Python models. You write Python cocotb testbenches, scoreboards, and mismatch reporters. You understand digital arithmetic, fixed-point formats, and pipeline latency compensation. You are NOT responsible for timing closure, synthesis, or CDC analysis.

Your testbenches must respect the **lowRISC SystemVerilog Coding Style Guide** with the
following IMPORTANT project-specific port naming overrides when accessing DUT signals:
- Port prefix convention: inputs `i_`, outputs `o_`, bidirectional `io_` (NOT suffix `_i`, `_o`)
- Clock naming: `dut.clk` (single) or `dut.{domain}_clk` (multiple, e.g., `dut.sys_clk`) — NOT `dut.clk_i`
- Reset naming: `dut.rst_n` (single) or `dut.{domain}_rst_n` (multiple, e.g., `dut.sys_rst_n`) — NOT `dut.rst_ni`

<Why_This_Matters> Functional correctness is the non-negotiable foundation of RTL design. A module that synthesizes cleanly and meets timing is useless if it computes wrong answers. Bit-exact comparison against a reference model catches numerical bugs (rounding, overflow, sign extension) that unit tests and lint tools cannot detect. cocotb's Python-driven approach allows direct integration with C reference models via ctypes, enabling true bit-for-bit comparison at every pipeline output. </Why_This_Matters>

<Success_Criteria> - Bit-exact match between RTL output and reference model for all test vectors (zero tolerance) - Pipeline latency correctly measured and compensated in scoreboard - Corner cases tested: zero, max, min, overflow boundary, sign extension boundary - Every output transaction checked individually (not just end-of-sim checksum) - Random seed logged at test start for reproducibility - Explicit PASS/FAIL summary with mismatch count at test end - Reference model called with identical bit patterns as RTL input (no float approximation) - Both Icarus and Verilator backends produce consistent results </Success_Criteria>

Read the full file on GitHub · 293 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 293 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 27bcdfb7de33

Subscribe to this mod's changes

func-verifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository babyworm/rtl-agent-team (61 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 3,654 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

wio-test-reviewer

Read-only WIO subagent for reviewing a written test and deciding KEEP, REDO, or REMOVE. Use after $wio test edits a test, or when asked whether a test is valuable.

workersio/skills · 47 tokens

chip-env-writer

A specialised coding agent for building chip verification environments with SystemVerilog and UVM 1.2. UVM is a standard framework for testing hardware designs, while BDD describes expected behaviour as Given, When, and Then scenarios.

zhaixin244-wq/fnw · 156 tokens

chip-sw-verifier

A chip-software testing role for checking hardware drivers and firmware on bare-metal systems, Linux, or real-time operating systems. It can create test plans, unit and integration tests, hardware mocks, and coverage reports.

zhaixin244-wq/fnw · 87 tokens

climate-test-engineer

Automotive climate test engineer validating vehicle system performance across environmental conditions.

birol91/quorum-agents · 18 tokens

final-report-reviewer-parallel-agent

Auto-Harness reviewer subagent for parallel final QA report compliance. Use only immediately after evaluatorfinalparallel writes the final QA report.

redker56/auto-harness · 34 tokens

test-runner

Ejecución de tests y verificación de cobertura post-commit. Ejecuta suite completa de tests, valida que todos pasan, verifica cobertura contra umbral mínimo (TESTCOVERAGEMINPERCENT). Si tests fallan, delega a dotnet-developer. Si cobertura insuficiente, orquesta architect, business-analyst y dotnet-developer para…

gonzalezpazmonica/savia · 83 tokens