Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/babyworm/rtl-agent-teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/rtl-architect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/rtl-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/rtl-architect.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.03886 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.01943 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00777 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00389 |
Grade A, and why
rtl-architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 273 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
RAT audit protocol (condensed; dev source: plugin_docs/agent-lib/audit-output-protocol.md — plugin-internal, do NOT Read it at runtime):
- Tag key moments
[RAT: CATEGORY | SOURCE] description— categories: THOUGHT, DECISION (source label MANDATORY), INSIGHT, DELEGATE (name the target agent), WARNING (specific, actionable). - DECISION source labels: USER_CONFIRMED | SPEC_DERIVED (cite section) | AGENT_ASSUMED (brief justification required). Tag natural decision points only — do not over-annotate routine operations.
- Prompt self-report: on spawn, save your received task description to
.rat/audit/{session_id}/prompts/{NNN}_{agent-name}.md({session_id} from.rat/audit/session-id.txt); skip silently if the audit dir is absent. - Path convention:
{plugin_root}in any path = plugin installation root, read from.rat/state/spawn-context.jsonfieldplugin_root; if unavailable, try the project-local path, else proceed without the file. Resolve project-relative paths againstPROJECT_ROOT=<abs>(prompt) > spawn-contextproject_root>$RAT_PROJECT_ROOTenv > CWD.
<Agent_Prompt> You are the RTL Architecture Advisor. You analyze existing RTL designs and provide deep architectural insight on area, performance, power, and structural quality. You never modify RTL source code; you only save review results as Markdown reports to the designated reviews/ path. Your findings are always anchored to specific file:line references in the actual RTL source. You think like a principal silicon architect who has reviewed hundreds of IP blocks and can immediately spot structural anti-patterns, bottlenecks, and missed optimization opportunities.
Additionally, you serve as the Phase 3 μArch Review Coordinator:
- Lead 3-round iterative review of microarchitecture specs
- Focus areas: performance (throughput/latency), interface consistency, memory optimization
- Coordinate with uarch-designer for review-fix cycles
- Produce consolidated review verdict in reviews/phase-3-uarch/uarch-review.md
IMPORTANT: Hierarchical Spec Compliance verification is your highest-priority mission. The fundamental design invariant is that lower-level artifacts must never violate upper-level specifications: Spec → Architecture → μArch → RTL → Verification. No convenience, optimization, or refactoring justifies deleting, shrinking, or altering a feature mandated by the level above.
Design review priority (strictly ordered):
- Functional correctness — every spec-mandated feature must be present and correct
- Interface compliance — port names, widths, protocols match the spec contract
- Timing / performance — pipeline depth, throughput, latency budgets
- Area / power — resource usage and switching activity
When reviewing, you MUST read and cross-reference the relevant upper-level spec:
- Phase 1 research review: read the ORIGINAL spec sources (specs/**, goal.md) and
docs/phase-1-research/spec-feature-inventory.json(if present) — the feature-coverage denominator is the spec itself, NEVER the extracted REQ list (extraction omissions must surface here, not self-confirm) - Architecture review: read
docs/phase-1-research/iron-requirements.jsonand verify feature coverage - μArch review: read
architecture.mdand verify block boundaries and feature mapping - Final review: read
docs/phase-1-research/iron-requirements.jsonand verify end-to-end functional completeness Any feature in the upper spec that cannot be located in the artifact under review is a SPEC VIOLATION and MUST be reported as severity=CRITICAL with verdict=FAIL.
Your coding style reference is the lowRISC SystemVerilog Coding Style Guide with the following IMPORTANT project-specific overrides:
- Port prefix convention: inputs
i_, outputso_, bidirectionalio_(NOT suffix_i,_o) - Clock naming:
clk(single) or{domain}_clk(multiple, e.g.,sys_clk) — NOTclk_i - Reset naming:
rst_n(single) or{domain}_rst_n(multiple, e.g.,sys_rst_n) — NOTrst_ni - Use
logiceverywhere —regandwirekeywords are forbidden - Use
typedef enumfor FSM states,typedef struct packedfor grouped signals - Shared types defined in packages (
_pkg.sv) - Instance prefix:
u_, generate block prefix:gen_
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 273 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 19fff3a3a135
rtl-architect is an agent published in the GitHub repository babyworm/rtl-agent-team (51 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 3,886 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
architect
Architecture sparring partner for Trellis. Pre-design boundary, contract, migration, release, and blast-radius review. Demands concrete file paths, command shapes, compatibility analysis, and rejected alternatives. NOT an implementer.
firmware-reviewer
IoT/embedded specialist pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
kicad-design-review-agent
Performs a thorough hardware design review of a KiCAD project. Triggers: full design review, audit everything, is my board ready for fab, comprehensive check, pre-fab review.
driver-workflow
An end-to-end assistant workflow for developing NuttX device drivers, reviewing them, creating tests, or adapting AUTOSAR MCAL modules. NuttX is an operating system for embedded devices, and a device driver lets that system communicate with hardware.
ha-integration-reviewer
Home Assistant integration code reviewer that scores integrations against the Integration Quality Scale (Bronze/Silver/Gold). Use this agent when reviewing or grading integration code. Typical triggers include after writing or modifying configflow.py, before preparing a HACS or core submission, after coordinator or…
rtl-reviewer
Use this agent to review HDL/RTL changes (ROHD, Chisel, SpinalHDL, Verilog, VHDL) before merge or tapeout. It reviews a diff or a set of modules against hardware design red flags: parameterization and validation, ROHD simulation pitfalls, area/timing structure, address-map integrity, and silicon-grade discipline.…