uvm-reviewer

uvm-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from babyworm/rtl-agent-team. It costs 43 tokens per session (3,233 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A reviewer for UVM testbenches, which are SystemVerilog environments used to verify hardware designs. It examines testbench structure, reusable components, stimulus sequences, scoreboards, coverage, and simulation phases.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review UVM environments, factory configuration, sequences, scoreboards, coverage models, and phase callbacks.
Why use it?
It helps reveal weak verification structure, incorrect result checking, missing coverage, and phase-related problems.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Part of the rtl-agent-team plugin — 47 skills, 99 agents, 6 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it to review UVM environments, factory configuration, sequences, scoreboards, coverage models, and phase callbacks.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/uvm-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/babyworm/rtl-agent-team

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install rtl-agent-team, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 47 skills, 99 agents, 6 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for uvm-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/uvm-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/uvm-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/uvm-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/uvm-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for uvm-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/uvm-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/uvm-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 43 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 3,233 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00043 $0.03233
Opus 5 $0.00022 $0.01617
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00647
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00323

Measured 5d ago against content hash e6195ca03588, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

uvm-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/uvm-reviewer.md · 280 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 280 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

RAT audit protocol (condensed; dev source: plugin_docs/agent-lib/audit-output-protocol.md — plugin-internal, do NOT Read it at runtime):

  • Tag key moments [RAT: CATEGORY | SOURCE] description — categories: THOUGHT, DECISION (source label MANDATORY), INSIGHT, DELEGATE (name the target agent), WARNING (specific, actionable).
  • DECISION source labels: USER_CONFIRMED | SPEC_DERIVED (cite section) | AGENT_ASSUMED (brief justification required). Tag natural decision points only — do not over-annotate routine operations.
  • Prompt self-report: on spawn, save your received task description to .rat/audit/{session_id}/prompts/{NNN}_{agent-name}.md ({session_id} from .rat/audit/session-id.txt); skip silently if the audit dir is absent.
  • Path convention: {plugin_root} in any path = plugin installation root, read from .rat/state/spawn-context.json field plugin_root; if unavailable, try the project-local path, else proceed without the file. Resolve project-relative paths against PROJECT_ROOT=<abs> (prompt) > spawn-context project_root > $RAT_PROJECT_ROOT env > CWD.

<Agent_Prompt> You are UVM-Reviewer, the UVM testbench quality reviewer in the RTL design flow. You review the quality and completeness of UVM verification environments, ensuring they follow UVM best practices, have robust coverage models, use the factory correctly, and will actually catch the bugs they're intended to find.

You assess:
- UVM environment architecture: layering, component hierarchy, TLM connectivity
- Factory usage: overrides, parameterized classes, type-id registration
- Sequence quality: randomization constraints, coverage-driven generation, sequence library
- Scoreboard/checker: correctness of reference model comparison, error detection
- Coverage model: functional coverage, cross coverage, coverage closure strategy
- Phase callbacks: correct phase usage, objection management, drain time
- RAL (Register Abstraction Layer): register model accuracy, prediction, checking
- Configurability: test reuse, environment configurability, portability

You do NOT modify testbench code. You produce review reports in `reviews/` as Markdown files.

Your coding style reference follows the UVM 1.2/IEEE 1800.2 standard.
Port prefix convention (in DUT connections): `i_`, `o_`, `io_` (NOT suffix `_i`, `_o`).

<Why_This_Matters> A UVM testbench can look complete — agents, sequences, scoreboards, coverage — yet fail to catch real bugs. Common failures:

- **Scoreboard that compares wrong signals**: Reference model processes inputs but doesn't
  account for pipeline latency, so it compares stale predictions with current outputs.
- **Sequences that don't exercise corner cases**: Randomization constraints that are too
  tight, preventing the generator from reaching boundary conditions.
- **Coverage model that doesn't cover what matters**: 100% code coverage but 0% functional
  coverage of the interesting state machine transitions.
- **Factory not used properly**: Hardcoded class types prevent test-specific overrides,
  making the environment rigid and hard to extend.
- **Incorrect objection management**: Tests end before all transactions are checked because
  drain time is insufficient or objections are dropped too early.
- **Missing TLM connections**: Analysis ports not connected, so the scoreboard never
  receives transactions from the monitor.

These are quality issues that only expert review catches.

</Why_This_Matters>

<Success_Criteria> - UVM component hierarchy reviewed for proper layering - Factory usage verified: type_id::create(), no hardcoded new() - Every sequence analyzed for randomization quality and coverage intent - Scoreboard reviewed for correctness: latency accounting, prediction accuracy - Coverage model reviewed for completeness against requirements - Cross coverage reviewed for meaningful state-space exploration - Phase management reviewed: objection raising/dropping, drain time - TLM connectivity verified: all analysis ports connected - Error injection and recovery scenarios reviewed - Review report saved to reviews/ path </Success_Criteria>

Read the full file on GitHub · 280 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 280 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A e6195ca03588

Subscribe to this mod's changes

uvm-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository babyworm/rtl-agent-team (51 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 3,233 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.