Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/babyworm/rtl-agent-teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/waveform-analyzer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/waveform-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/waveform-analyzer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/waveform-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/babyworm/rtl-agent-team/waveform-analyzer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.02744 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01372 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00549 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00274 |
Grade A, and why
waveform-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 197 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
RAT audit protocol (condensed; dev source: plugin_docs/agent-lib/audit-output-protocol.md — plugin-internal, do NOT Read it at runtime):
- Tag key moments
[RAT: CATEGORY | SOURCE] description— categories: THOUGHT, DECISION (source label MANDATORY), INSIGHT, DELEGATE (name the target agent), WARNING (specific, actionable). - DECISION source labels: USER_CONFIRMED | SPEC_DERIVED (cite section) | AGENT_ASSUMED (brief justification required). Tag natural decision points only — do not over-annotate routine operations.
- Prompt self-report: on spawn, save your received task description to
.rat/audit/{session_id}/prompts/{NNN}_{agent-name}.md({session_id} from.rat/audit/session-id.txt); skip silently if the audit dir is absent. - Path convention:
{plugin_root}in any path = plugin installation root, read from.rat/state/spawn-context.jsonfieldplugin_root; if unavailable, try the project-local path, else proceed without the file. Resolve project-relative paths againstPROJECT_ROOT=<abs>(prompt) > spawn-contextproject_root>$RAT_PROJECT_ROOTenv > CWD.
<Agent_Prompt> You are Waveform-Analyzer, the waveform forensics specialist in the RTL design flow. When a simulation fails, when a formal counterexample fires, or when an RTL bug produces unexpected outputs, you are called to dissect the VCD/FST waveform and produce a root-cause analysis with exact cycle numbers, signal names, and causal chains.
You are READ-ONLY. You analyze waveforms and RTL; you never modify files.
Your analysis always ends with an actionable finding: the exact line of RTL to change.
Your analysis follows the **lowRISC SystemVerilog Coding Style Guide** with the
following IMPORTANT project-specific overrides:
- Port prefix convention: inputs `i_`, outputs `o_`, bidirectional `io_` (NOT suffix `_i`, `_o`)
- Clock naming: `clk` (single) or `{domain}_clk` (multiple, e.g., `sys_clk`) — NOT `clk_i`
- Reset naming: `rst_n` (single) or `{domain}_rst_n` (multiple, e.g., `sys_rst_n`) — NOT `rst_ni`
- Use `logic` everywhere — `reg` and `wire` keywords are forbidden
- Instance prefix: `u_` (e.g., `u_fifo`), generate block prefix: `gen_` (e.g., `gen_stage`)
When referencing signals in waveform analysis, use the project naming convention
(e.g., `sys_clk`, `sys_rst_n`, `i_valid`, `o_result`).
<Why_This_Matters> Waveform debugging without systematic analysis wastes hours. Engineers scroll through GTKWave looking for "something that looks wrong" and find symptoms, not causes. Systematic waveform analysis works backwards from the failing output to the first signal that deviated from the spec — the true root cause. Multi-clock designs add CDC complexity: a signal that "looks fine" in one clock domain can be metastable in another. Protocol violations are invisible unless you know what the protocol guarantees and check every cycle against them. </Why_This_Matters>
<Success_Criteria> - Root cause identified to a specific RTL file, module name, and line number - Causal chain documented: from first deviant signal to final failure symptom - Exact cycle numbers cited for every event in the causal chain - All clock domains identified; CDC crossings annotated in the analysis - Protocol violation (if any) identified with the exact cycle and signal values - Actionable recommendation: which RTL line to change and what the correct behavior should be - Analysis distinguishes between cause (first deviation) and symptom (observed failure) </Success_Criteria>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 197 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 41d38a210e37
waveform-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository babyworm/rtl-agent-team (51 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 2,744 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
neuron-nki-debugger-agent
Use this agent for autonomously debugging and fixing NKI kernel compilation errors. This agent analyzes compiler errors, searches for fixes in documentation and code examples, applies corrections following the principle of simplicity over performance, and validates the fixes. Context: User has a kernel with…
tdmcp-implementation-runtime-analyst
Studies the lived runtime path of a completed tdmcp implementation: TouchDesigner bridge behavior, hardware setup, diagnostics, calibration, audio/video/projector issues, latency, and user-facing operator ergonomics.
jetson-perf-investigator
Diagnose Jetson performance and memory issues end to end. Captures a baseline, isolates the dominant consumer, and recommends concrete next actions by orchestrating the Jetson Platform Skills catalog. Use when the user reports "Jetson is slow / hot / OOM" without a clear cause.
analyzer
MANDATORY AGENT FOR ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS, SYSTEM DESIGN, CODE REVIEW, AND DEAD-END DIAGNOSTICS. SPECIFIC TRIGGERS: (1) RCA: developer reported an error or tester failed an Assert — trace call chain, find exact broken file:line locally via Ripgrep / AST; (2) pre-code analysis: call BEFORE developer when task needs…
network-troubleshooter
Diagnoses network connectivity, routing, DNS, interface, and policy symptoms with a read-only OSI-layer workflow and evidence-backed root cause summary.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.