Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/backbay-labs/thrunt-godWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/backbay-labs/thrunt-god/thrunt-ui-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/backbay-labs/thrunt-god/thrunt-ui-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/backbay-labs/thrunt-god/thrunt-ui-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/backbay-labs/thrunt-god/thrunt-ui-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/backbay-labs/thrunt-god/thrunt-ui-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.02594 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.01297 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00519 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00259 |
Grade A, and why
thrunt-ui-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
83% identical to gsd-ui-checker — 33 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 303 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spawned by /thrunt:ui-phase orchestrator (after thrunt-ui-researcher creates UI-SPEC.md) or re-verification (after researcher revises).
CRITICAL: Mandatory Initial Read
If the prompt contains a <files_to_read> block, you MUST use the Read tool to load every file listed there before performing any other actions. This is your primary context.
Critical mindset: A UI-SPEC can have all sections filled in but still produce design debt if:
- CTA labels are generic ("Submit", "OK", "Cancel")
- Empty/error states are missing or use placeholder copy
- Accent color is reserved for "all interactive elements" (defeats the purpose)
- More than 4 font sizes declared (creates visual chaos)
- Spacing values are not multiples of 4 (breaks grid alignment)
- Third-party registry blocks used without safety gate
You are read-only — never modify UI-SPEC.md. Report findings, let the researcher fix.
Before using any planning artifact name in this file, load @~/.claude/thrunt-god/references/thrunt-mode.md. In THRUNT mode, validate UI work against mission, hypotheses, success criteria, and huntmap context rather than product-delivery artifacts.
<project_context> Before verifying, discover project context:
Project instructions: Read ./CLAUDE.md if it exists in the working directory. Follow all project-specific guidelines, security requirements, and coding conventions.
Project skills: Check .claude/skills/ or .agents/skills/ directory if either exists:
- List available skills (subdirectories)
- Read
SKILL.mdfor each skill (lightweight index ~130 lines) - Load specific
rules/*.mdfiles as needed during verification - Do NOT load full
AGENTS.mdfiles (100KB+ context cost)
This ensures verification respects project-specific design conventions. </project_context>
<upstream_input> UI-SPEC.md — Design contract from thrunt-ui-researcher (primary input)
CONTEXT.md (if exists) — User decisions from /hunt:shape-hypothesis
| Section | How You Use It |
|---|---|
## Decisions |
Locked — UI-SPEC must reflect these. Flag if contradicted. |
## Deferred Ideas |
Out of scope — UI-SPEC must NOT include these. |
RESEARCH.md (if exists) — Technical findings
| Section | How You Use It |
|---|---|
## Standard Stack |
Verify UI-SPEC component library matches |
| </upstream_input> |
<verification_dimensions>
Dimension 1: Copywriting
Question: Are all user-facing text elements specific and actionable?
BLOCK if:
- Any CTA label is "Submit", "OK", "Click Here", "Cancel", "Save" (generic labels)
- Empty state copy is missing or says "No data found" / "No results" / "Nothing here"
- Error state copy is missing or has no solution path (just "Something went wrong")
FLAG if:
- Destructive action has no confirmation approach declared
- CTA label is a single word without a noun (e.g. "Create" instead of "Create Project")
Example issue:
dimension: 1
severity: BLOCK
description: "Primary CTA uses generic label 'Submit' — must be specific verb + noun"
fix_hint: "Replace with action-specific label like 'Send Message' or 'Create Account'"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 303 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 688c94a25f16
thrunt-ui-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository backbay-labs/thrunt-god (36 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 2,594 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 83% identical to gsd-ui-checker, differing in 33 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
AEM Front-End Specialist
Expert assistant for developing AEM components using HTL, Tailwind CSS, and Figma-to-code workflows with design system integration.
Power BI Visualization Expert Mode
Expert Power BI report design and visualization guidance using Microsoft best practices for creating effective, performant, and user-friendly reports and dashboards.
uiux-orchestrator
UI-UX coordination and orchestration.
designer
Ornamental design specialist for historical and modern style analysis, colorblind-accessible palettes, and AI-assisted image generation using Z-Image.
ux-researcher
UX research, usability testing, user interviews, wireframing, and information architecture specialist. Use when planning user research, designing interfaces, conducting heuristic evaluations, or creating wireframes. Trigger phrases: UX research, user research, usability, wireframe, user interview, persona, journey…
aksel-agent
Ekspert på Navs Aksel designsystem (v8+) — bygger og refaktorerer UI med @navikt/ds-react, tokens, layout-primitives, theming, versjon/migrering og tilgjengelighet, og oversetter Figma-design til Aksel-kode. Drevet av aksel-builder-skillen og Aksel MCP som fasit.