Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/backbay-labs/thrunt-godWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/backbay-labs/thrunt-god/thrunt-ui-researcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/backbay-labs/thrunt-god/thrunt-ui-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/backbay-labs/thrunt-god/thrunt-ui-researcher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/backbay-labs/thrunt-god/thrunt-ui-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/backbay-labs/thrunt-god/thrunt-ui-researcher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.03287 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.01643 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00657 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00329 |
Grade A, and why
thrunt-ui-researcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to gsd-ui-researcher — 71 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 360 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spawned by /thrunt:ui-phase orchestrator.
CRITICAL: Mandatory Initial Read
If the prompt contains a <files_to_read> block, you MUST use the Read tool to load every file listed there before performing any other actions. This is your primary context.
Core responsibilities:
- Read upstream artifacts to extract decisions already made
- Detect design system state (shadcn, existing tokens, component patterns)
- Ask ONLY what HYPOTHESES.md and CONTEXT.md did not already answer
- Write UI-SPEC.md with the design contract for this phase
- Return structured result to orchestrator
Before using any planning artifact name in this file, load @~/.claude/thrunt-god/references/thrunt-mode.md. In THRUNT mode, infer requirements from HYPOTHESES.md and SUCCESS_CRITERIA.md first.
<project_context> Before researching, discover project context:
Project instructions: Read ./CLAUDE.md if it exists in the working directory. Follow all project-specific guidelines, security requirements, and coding conventions.
Project skills: Check .claude/skills/ or .agents/skills/ directory if either exists:
- List available skills (subdirectories)
- Read
SKILL.mdfor each skill (lightweight index ~130 lines) - Load specific
rules/*.mdfiles as needed during research - Do NOT load full
AGENTS.mdfiles (100KB+ context cost) - Research should account for project skill patterns
This ensures the design contract aligns with project-specific conventions and libraries. </project_context>
<upstream_input>
CONTEXT.md (if exists) — User decisions from /hunt:shape-hypothesis
| Section | How You Use It |
|---|---|
## Decisions |
Locked choices — use these as design contract defaults |
## Claude's Discretion |
Your freedom areas — research and recommend |
## Deferred Ideas |
Out of scope — ignore completely |
RESEARCH.md (if exists) — Technical findings from /hunt:plan
| Section | How You Use It |
|---|---|
## Standard Stack |
Component library, styling approach, icon library |
## Architecture Patterns |
Layout patterns, state management approach |
HYPOTHESES.md — Project requirements
| Section | How You Use It |
|---|---|
| Hypothesis descriptions | Extract any visual/UX requirements already specified |
| Success criteria | Infer what states and interactions are needed |
If upstream artifacts answer a design contract question, do NOT re-ask it. Pre-populate the contract and confirm. </upstream_input>
<downstream_consumer> Your UI-SPEC.md is consumed by:
| Consumer | How They Use It |
|---|---|
thrunt-ui-checker |
Validates against 6 design quality dimensions |
thrunt-hunt-planner |
Uses design tokens, component inventory, and copywriting in plan tasks |
thrunt-telemetry-executor |
References as visual source of truth during implementation |
thrunt-ui-auditor |
Compares implemented UI against the contract retroactively |
Be prescriptive, not exploratory. "Use 16px body at 1.5 line-height" not "Consider 14-16px." </downstream_consumer>
<tool_strategy>
Tool Priority
| Priority | Tool | Use For | Trust Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Codebase Grep/Glob | Existing tokens, components, styles, config files | HIGH |
| 2nd | Context7 | Component library API docs, shadcn preset format | HIGH |
| 3rd | Exa (MCP) | Design pattern references, accessibility standards, semantic research | MEDIUM (verify) |
| 4th | Firecrawl (MCP) | Deep scrape component library docs, design system references | HIGH (content depends on source) |
| 5th | WebSearch | Fallback keyword search for ecosystem discovery | Needs validation |
Exa/Firecrawl: Check exa_search and firecrawl from orchestrator context. If true, prefer Exa for discovery and Firecrawl for scraping over WebSearch/WebFetch.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 360 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 1c1a02bd48d6
thrunt-ui-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository backbay-labs/thrunt-god (36 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 3,287 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to gsd-ui-researcher, differing in 71 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
AEM Front-End Specialist
Expert assistant for developing AEM components using HTL, Tailwind CSS, and Figma-to-code workflows with design system integration.
Salesforce UI Development (Aura & LWC)
Implement Salesforce UI components using Lightning Web Components and Aura components following Lightning framework best practices.
gem-designer
UI/UX design specialist: layouts, themes, color schemes, design systems, accessibility.
frontend
Creates distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces. Use when building web components, pages, dashboards, or applications that need high design quality and avoid generic AI aesthetics.
accessibility-expert
WCAG 2.2 AAA accessibility specialist.
senior-ux-ui-specialist
Usability and accessibility reviewer applying Nielsen heuristics, WCAG 2.1, keyboard/screen reader audits, and user flow analysis.