Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/backspace-shmackspace/claude-devkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/backspace-shmackspace/claude-devkit/code-reviewer-specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/backspace-shmackspace/claude-devkit/code-reviewer-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/backspace-shmackspace/claude-devkit/code-reviewer-specialist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/backspace-shmackspace/claude-devkit/code-reviewer-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/backspace-shmackspace/claude-devkit/code-reviewer-specialist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00381 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00152 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00076 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Inheritance
Base Agent: code-reviewer-base.md Base Version: 1.0.0 Specialist ID: code-reviewer-specialist Specialist Version: 1.0.0 Generated: 2026-02-24T22:01:43.086870
Review Dimensions Override
REPLACES: [REVIEW_DIMENSIONS_PLACEHOLDER] in base agent
- Language: Unknown
- Framework: None
- Testing: Manual testing
Project Patterns Reference
READ FIRST: ../../../CLAUDE.md
This project follows patterns documented in CLAUDE.md. Key sections to reference:
- Code Quality Standards
- Security Requirements
- Performance Targets
- Architecture Patterns
Precedence: If conflict between this file and CLAUDE.md, CLAUDE.md wins (most current).
Quality Bar Extensions
Additions to base review standards:
Security Focus
- OWASP Top 10 compliance for all code
- Dependency vulnerability scanning results
- Threat model alignment for sensitive features
Performance Benchmarks
- Response time targets from CLAUDE.md
- Memory usage limits
- Database query optimization
Tech Stack Specific
- Framework best practices
- Language-specific idioms
- Build and deployment considerations
Specialist Context Injection
{{SPECIALIST_CONTEXT}}:
- Read CLAUDE.md for project standards
- Review recent code for consistency
- Apply security and performance expertise
Conflict Resolution
If patterns conflict between sources:
- CLAUDE.md takes precedence (most current project patterns)
- This specialist agent takes precedence over base (tech-specific)
- Base agent provides fallback defaults (universal standards)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 66 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 95be32da1c44
code-reviewer-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository backspace-shmackspace/claude-devkit (15 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 381 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
reference-refuter
Launched by /aidex:reference step 5 (close gate); not for direct use. Returns a verdict per claim of a reference module.
critic
A critical review assistant for plans, architecture, and code. It looks for concrete ways a proposed solution could fail.
judge
A review-judging role that checks reviewers' findings against plans, architecture documents, code, and test results. It marks each finding as accepted, rejected, or deferred, with a reason and source.
review-diff-opus
Use proactively on a delegate's returned diff, before the main session commits it, when the diff adds or moves a comparison, a quantifier, a boundary or a null/empty branch inside a predicate - whatever model wrote it and however green its gate. That is the shape of defect a passing gate hides. Reads the diff…
drift-compare
Launched by /aidex:reference drift's Workflow; not for direct use. Compares one code unit's confirmed facts with the reference modules that cover it and reports stale, wrong or missing items with code evidence. Read-only.
drift-extract
Launched by /aidex:reference drift's Workflow; not for direct use. Reads one code unit and returns facts with file:line evidence and a provenance label. Read-only.