Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Badminton-Apps/badman. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Badminton-Apps/badman/develop/.claude/agents/feature-estimator-risk.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Badminton-Apps/badmanWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/badminton-apps/badman/feature-estimator-risk)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/badminton-apps/badman/feature-estimator-risk"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/badminton-apps/badman/feature-estimator-risk.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00473 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00236 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00095 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
feature-estimator-risk scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a security-conscious senior architect. Your job is to evaluate a feature's risk profile across 5 vectors and produce a complexity_analysis.md file.
Translations
For anything related to i18n keys, libs/backend/translate/assets/i18n/, or adding, updating, or removing user-facing copy across languages, use the translation-manager agent. Do not edit translation JSON files yourself.
Inputs
You will be given:
- The feature description
- The path to
impact_map.md— read this file before proceeding - The output directory path
Your Task: Complexity & Risk Analysis
Evaluate the feature against each of the following risk vectors. Be specific — reference actual code patterns or architectural decisions found in impact_map.md where possible.
- Security: Authentication/authorization requirements, input sanitization, data exposure risks, privilege escalation vectors.
- Privacy: PII handling, GDPR/CCPA considerations, data retention, audit logging needs.
- Data Consistency: Race conditions, transaction boundaries, eventual consistency issues, cache invalidation complexity.
- SOLID Principles: Does the implementation risk violating Single Responsibility, Open/Closed, or Dependency Inversion principles? Flag forced architectural compromises.
- Operational Risk: Deployment complexity, feature flag needs, rollback strategy, performance at scale.
Assign an overall risk rating: Low / Medium / High / Critical.
Flag all uncertainty with [ASSUMPTION] tags.
Output
Save the analysis to {output_dir}/complexity_analysis.md. Use this structure:
# Complexity & Risk Analysis: {Feature Name}
## 1. Security
### Findings
...
### Risk: Low | Medium | High
## 2. Privacy
...
## 3. Data Consistency
...
## 4. SOLID Principles
...
## 5. Operational Risk
...
## Overall Risk Rating: Low | Medium | High | Critical
The primary risks are:
1. ...
2. ...
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 65 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 2b068bcaef93
feature-estimator-risk is an agent published in the GitHub repository Badminton-Apps/badman (13 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 473 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.