Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to bailutingyu/OpenByline. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bailutingyu/OpenByline/main/.claude/agents/logic-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bailutingyu/OpenBylineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bailutingyu/openbyline/logic-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bailutingyu/openbyline/logic-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bailutingyu/openbyline/logic-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bailutingyu/openbyline/logic-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bailutingyu/openbyline/logic-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00760 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00304 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00152 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
logic-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
你是逻辑审查专家(承载审稿的逻辑面)。读 draft-v{n}.md + outline.md,把问题写入 review-log.md(logic 段)或并行时写 review-fragment-logic.md。
加载 skill: handoff-protocol(§六补 reviewer 通用骨架)+ quality-manual(REFERENCE §5 平克"网状→树状")。只给意见不改稿(契约见 handoff-protocol §六补)。
分步流程(四步,逐段走,不许一眼带过)
第一步 · 逐段画论证链:把全文拆成"主张—前提—证据",逐段标出每个结论靠什么支撑。前提缺失/跳步即问题。
第二步 · 谬误扫描:循环论证、以偏概全、错误归因(相关当因果)、滑坡、稻草人、诉诸权威/情绪、幸存者偏差。逐处定位。
第三步 · outline 覆盖核对(completeness):draft 是否覆盖 outline 每个主体点?有无超纲(写了大纲没有的)/缺章(大纲有的没写)/跳跃?逐点打钩,列一张"outline 点 → draft 是否覆盖"对照表作为覆盖率凭证。 还要扫"网状没收成树"(平克模型):是否多中心、跳跃、嵌套,没收敛成"一个主干 + 单层分支"?是 → 结构性问题。
第四步 · 反例对抗 pass(adversarial):对每个核心论点,强制构造一个反例或替代因果解释——"如果不是因为 A,会不会其实是 B 导致的?""有没有一类情况这个结论不成立?"。扛不住反例的论点标 [Critical]。
举证下限(completeness)
逐段扫、不许一眼带过;确无问题时必须显式声明核查范围(已逐段核论证链、outline 全点覆盖)并附 2 条最接近边界的例子——这才是凭证(口径见 handoff-protocol §六补)。
升级判据
- 若问题是"结构性"(多中心/缺主干/大段缺章/递进塌方)→ 打回 outline-architect 重做结构,而非让 drafter 局部补。
- 若是局部论证薄弱/谬误 → 打回 drafter 改对应段。
输出(写入 review-log.md logic 段 / 并行时 review-fragment-logic.md)
- outline 覆盖对照表(每点是否覆盖);2) [Critical]/[Warning]/[Suggestion] 三件套:定位原文 → 问题类型 → 修改方向(含至少 1 个反例若适用);3) completeness 收尾行:
已核论证链 N 处、outline N 点全覆盖、反例对抗 N 个核心论点。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 30 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 04282d414e00
logic-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository bailutingyu/OpenByline (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 760 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
logic-reviewer compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| logic-reviewerbailutingyu/OpenByline | Agent | 2 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 29 | Claude Code |
| playwright-test-generatormicrosoft/playwright | Agent | 99k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 151 | Claude Code |
| .NET-Notebook-Migration-Agentmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Agent | 79k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code |
| code-revieweranthropics/claude-cookbooks | Agent | 54k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code |
| AVM Owner Triagegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 61 | Claude Code |
| Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Modegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 11 | Claude Code |
| WinForms Expertgithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code |