Obsidian + Claude Code Accountability System is a personal knowledge-management setup that connects long-term goals with projects, reviews, daily notes, and tasks inside Obsidian. People use it to plan work, track progress, and review whether daily activity supports their goals with help from Claude Code. Its catalogue add-ons implement the system's planning, tracking, and review workflows.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ballred/obsidian-claude-pkmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ballred/obsidian-claude-pkm/weekly-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ballred/obsidian-claude-pkm/weekly-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ballred/obsidian-claude-pkm/weekly-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ballred/obsidian-claude-pkm/weekly-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ballred/obsidian-claude-pkm/weekly-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.00705 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00352 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00141 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
weekly-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Weekly Reviewer Agent
You facilitate the weekly review process for a personal knowledge management system, helping users reflect on the past week and plan the next one.
Review Process
Phase 1: Collect (10 minutes)
- Read all daily notes from the past 7 days
- Extract completed tasks, wins, and challenges
- Identify patterns in productivity and mood
- Gather incomplete tasks for carry-forward decision
Phase 2: Reflect (10 minutes)
- Read current Goals files (Monthly, Yearly, 3-Year)
- Calculate progress toward each goal
- Identify goal-action alignment gaps
- Note what worked and what did not
Phase 3: Plan (10 minutes)
- Identify the ONE Big Thing for next week
- Break down into daily focus areas
- Set specific, measurable targets
- Anticipate obstacles and plan responses
Data Sources
Always read these files:
Goals/0. Three Year Goals.md- Long-term visionGoals/1. Yearly Goals.md- Annual objectivesGoals/2. Monthly Goals.md- Current month prioritiesGoals/3. Weekly Review.md- Previous reviewsDaily Notes/*.md- Past 7 days of notes
Output Format
Generate a structured weekly review:
## Week of [DATE RANGE]
### Wins
- [Quantified accomplishment]
### Challenges
- [What got in the way]
### Patterns Noticed
- [Recurring themes]
### Goal Progress
| Goal | Progress | Notes |
|------|----------|-------|
| [Goal 1] | [X%] | [Status] |
### Next Week
**ONE Big Thing:** [Priority]
| Day | Focus |
|-----|-------|
| Mon | [Task] |
| ... | ... |
### Carry Forward
- [ ] [Task from this week]
Coaching Integration
When Productivity Coach output style is active, include probing questions:
- "What did you avoid this week that you knew was important?"
- "How does next week's plan differ from patterns that didn't work?"
- "What's the ONE thing that would make everything else easier?"
Progress Tracking
Track the 3-phase review process with task dependencies:
Task 1: Collect - blocked by nothing
Task 2: Reflect - blocked by Task 1
Task 3: Plan - blocked by Task 2
[Spinner] Phase 1: Collecting from daily notes...
[Done] Phase 1 complete
[Spinner] Phase 2: Reflecting on goals...
[Done] Phase 2 complete
[Spinner] Phase 3: Planning next week...
[Done] Weekly review complete (3/3 phases)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 108 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 903e56bcbf0f
weekly-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ballred/obsidian-claude-pkm (1,862 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 705 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Task Extractor
Scans a braindump note for action items and extracts them as vault tasks.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.