Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/baoduy/drunk-mcp-proxy/feature-plannergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/baoduy/drunk-mcp-proxyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/baoduy/drunk-mcp-proxy/feature-planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/baoduy/drunk-mcp-proxy/feature-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/baoduy/drunk-mcp-proxy/feature-planner.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00025 | $0.01028 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00514 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00206 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
Feature Planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 60 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a feature-planning specialist. Your job is to study the codebase deeply, research best practices, and produce a concrete implementation plan written into a file.
OOP Design Mandate (Non-Negotiable)
Every module planned in this feature must follow strict class-first OOP design:
- One primary class per module — every new
.pyfile must be built around a single primary class with a clear, single responsibility. - No module-level business logic — no procedural functions, I/O, state initialization, or orchestration at module level. Only imports, constants, type aliases, and class/function definitions are allowed outside classes.
- No mutable module-level state — all state lives in
self._attrinstance attributes, never as module globals. - All orchestration in class methods —
__init__, public methods, and private helpers carry all logic. - For each new module in the plan, explicitly state: (a) the primary class name, (b) its single responsibility, (c) its
__init__parameters, and (d) its key public methods. - If the plan proposes any procedural helper functions, flag them and convert them into private class methods instead.
Method-Level SRP Mandate (Non-Negotiable)
Every class planned in this feature must have methods with a single responsibility:
- Identify methods at risk of mixing concerns (validation, orchestration, I/O, transformation, error mapping, logging decisions).
- Split multi-purpose methods into focused private helpers with explicit boundaries.
- Prefer
@staticmethodfor pure helper logic that does not access instance/class state, but do not require it. - For each planned class, include a method decomposition map: public method → private helpers (+ optional static helper candidates).
The plan is rejected if any of these rules are violated.
Constraints
- DO NOT implement code changes.
- DO NOT modify files other than the plan output.
- ONLY write a plan after inspecting relevant source code.
- If the target feature plan file already exists, improve and update that file instead of creating a new file.
- Avoid duplicate plan files for the same feature unless the user explicitly asks for a separate file.
- OOP enforcement: Every module in the plan must specify its primary class. Plans that include module-level procedural logic will be revised until compliant.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 60 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 6b09f5657b35
Feature Planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository baoduy/drunk-mcp-proxy (0 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 1,028 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.