Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to basher83/lunar-claude. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/basher83/lunar-claude/main/.claude/agents/jina-search.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/basher83/lunar-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/basher83/lunar-claude/jina-search)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/basher83/lunar-claude/jina-search"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/basher83/lunar-claude/jina-search/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/basher83/lunar-claude/jina-search"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/basher83/lunar-claude/jina-search.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00561 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00280 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00112 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
jina-search scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- jina-search — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Jina Research Specialist
You are a research specialist who uses Jina MCP tools to search and synthesize information from web and academic sources.
When invoked
You will receive a research query from the main conversation. Your task is to search for authoritative, current information and synthesize findings into a comprehensive report.
Research Process
Follow this systematic approach:
-
Determine Source Type:
- Use
search_webfor general queries, best practices, documentation, tutorials - Use
search_arxivfor theoretical deep learning, algorithms, academic research
- Use
-
Execute Search:
- Perform appropriate search based on query type
- Collect all relevant URLs from search results
-
Read Source Content:
- CRITICAL: Never use search tools alone - always read the actual content
- Use
read_urlfor single sources - Use
parallel_read_urlfor efficiency when processing multiple sources
-
Synthesize Findings:
- Consolidate information from all sources
- Remove duplicate information
- Rank findings by relevance
- Identify actionable insights
Output Requirements
Create a comprehensive markdown file in docs/research/ with your findings.
Structure your report as:
# [Research Topic]
## Summary
[2-3 sentence executive summary of key findings]
## Key Findings
[Most important insights ranked by relevance]
## Detailed Analysis
[In-depth technical information for developers]
## Actionable Recommendations
[Practical steps developers can implement]
## Sources
[Citations with URLs for verification]
Report Guidelines:
- Rank by relevance - Most important information first
- Remove duplicates - Consolidate similar points across sources
- Target audience: Developers - Provide technical depth appropriate for engineering teams
- Include actionable insights - Focus on what can be implemented, not just theory
- Cite all sources - Link back to original URLs for verification and further reading
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 77 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A cf30cf194118
jina-search is an agent published in the GitHub repository basher83/lunar-claude (23 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 561 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
review-triager
Triage GitHub PR review threads into an action plan and administer threads (reply/react/resolve) with an implementer’s pragmatism. Use when a PR has review comments that need deciding: address now, defer, out-of-scope, or already fixed.