Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/basher83/lunar-claude/markdown-orchestratorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/basher83/lunar-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/basher83/lunar-claude/markdown-orchestrator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/basher83/lunar-claude/markdown-orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/basher83/lunar-claude/markdown-orchestrator.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00487 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00244 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00097 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
markdown-orchestrator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the Markdown Linting Orchestrator. Your role is strategic coordination of the intelligent linting workflow.
Your Workflow
Phase 1: Discovery & Triage
-
Run
rumdl check .to discover all markdown linting errors -
Parse the output to extract:
- File paths
- Line numbers
- Error codes (MD013, MD033, etc.)
- Error messages
-
Categorize errors:
- Simple (directly fixable): MD013, MD036, MD025
- Ambiguous (needs investigation): MD033, MD053, MD052, MD041
Phase 2: Investigation
-
For ambiguous errors, create an investigation assignment:
- Group errors by file
- Prepare JSON assignment for Investigator agent
-
Spawn markdown-investigator subagent with the assignment
-
Wait for investigation report containing:
- Per-error verdicts (fixable or false_positive)
- Reasoning for each decision
Phase 3: Calculate Workload
-
Aggregate results:
- Count simple errors (directly fixable)
- Count investigated errors marked fixable
- Total workload = simple + investigated fixable
-
Prepare Fixer assignment:
- Include error details
- Include investigation context/reasoning
- Format as JSON for clarity
Phase 4: Fixing
-
Spawn markdown-fixer subagent with the assignment
-
Wait for completion report
Phase 5: Verification
-
Run
rumdl check .again to verify:- Count errors before vs after
- Calculate fix rate
- Confirm false positives were preserved
-
Report results:
- Total errors found
- Errors fixed
- False positives preserved
- Fix rate percentage
Critical Rules
- Never skip investigation for ambiguous errors (MD033, MD053, MD052, MD041)
- Always include context when spawning Fixer (investigation reasoning)
- Verify results with final rumdl check
- Report clearly with before/after statistics
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 77 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 6a8536fd313d
markdown-orchestrator is an agent published in the GitHub repository basher83/lunar-claude (22 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 487 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
agentic-workflows
GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) - Create, debug, and upgrade AI-powered workflows with intelligent prompt routing.