Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/plugin install dev-teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/a11y-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/a11y-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/a11y-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/a11y-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/a11y-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.01164 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00466 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00233 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00116 |
Grade A, and why
a11y-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 119 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Accessibility Review
Scope:
- **/*.svelte
- **/*.html
- **/*.jsx
- **/*.tsx
- **/*.vue
- **/*.razor
- **/*.cshtml
- **/*.jsp Cites: [adversarial-review-protocol]
Scope: UI component and template files only (.svelte, .html, .jsx, .tsx, .vue, .razor, .cshtml, .jsp). Skip non-component files (utilities, services, stores, configs, tests, routes/pages without markup).
Output JSON: per ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/knowledge/review-agent-output-contract.md (Whole-file load: short, canonical schema).
Status: pass=accessible, warn=minor gaps, fail=WCAG AA violations Severity: error=blocks users, warning=degrades experience, suggestion=enhancement Confidence: high=mechanical fix (add missing attribute, swap element); medium=direction clear, implementation may vary; none=requires human judgment (design decisions, color palette)
Context needs: full-file
Skip
Return {"status": "skip", "issues": [], "summary": "No UI component files found"} when:
- Target contains only logic files, configs, tests, or utilities
- No .svelte, .html, .jsx, .tsx, .vue, .razor, .cshtml, or .jsp files with component markup present
- Files are non-component modules (stores, services, helpers, route loaders)
Detect
Semantic HTML:
- div/span used where semantic element fits (nav, main, section, article, aside, header, footer)
- Heading levels skipped (h1 to h3 without h2)
- Lists of items not using ul/ol/li
- Buttons implemented as clickable divs or spans
ARIA attributes:
- Interactive elements missing accessible names (aria-label, aria-labelledby, or visible text)
- Redundant ARIA on elements with implicit roles (role="button" on button)
- aria-hidden="true" on focusable elements
- Missing aria-live for dynamic content updates
Keyboard navigation:
- Click handlers without corresponding keyboard handlers (onkeydown/onkeyup)
- Custom interactive elements missing tabindex
- Focus traps without escape mechanism
- Missing visible focus indicators (outline:none without replacement)
Color and contrast:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 119 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 903e0bace04d
a11y-review is an agent published in the GitHub repository bdfinst/agentic-dev-team (295 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 1,164 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
ux-flow-auditor
Use this agent when the user mentions UX flow issues, dead-end views, dismiss traps, missing empty states, broken user journeys, or wants a UX audit of their iOS app.
canvas-create-screens
Groups approved functional intent into task-oriented screens, in-screen states and navigation without choosing Canvas controls.
ijfw-accessibility-reviewer
Design-phase WCAG 2.1 AA review of UI artefacts: contrast, semantics, focus, ARIA. Trigger per design review pass.
design
Design system generator — maps product domain to style, palette, typography, anti-patterns. Creates .rune/design-system.md. Use BEFORE any frontend code generation.
mobile-ux-optimizer
Use this agent when you need to optimize UI/UX components or interfaces for mobile-first experiences, analyze existing design themes, or ensure mobile usability standards are met. Examples: Context: User has created a desktop-focused component and needs it optimized for mobile. user: 'I've built this navigation…
designer
Use for visual/UX design authoring — reference decomposition, design principles, divergent concept drafts, milestone screen prototypes, and DESIGN.md authoring support. Generation only; auditing stays with reviewer[design].