Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bdfinst/agentic-dev-teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/csharp-quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/csharp-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/csharp-quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/csharp-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/csharp-quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00456 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00182 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00091 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
csharp-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
C# Quality
Output JSON:
{"status": "pass|warn|fail|skip", "issues": [{"severity": "error|warning|suggestion", "confidence": "high|medium|none", "file": "", "line": 0, "message": "", "suggestedFix": ""}], "summary": ""}
Status: pass=modern C#, warn=improvements needed, fail=unsafe patterns Severity: error=null safety issue or async misuse, warning=non-modern pattern, suggestion=style Confidence: high=mechanical (enable nullable, use record); medium=design choice; none=domain context
Context needs: diff-only
File scope: *.cs
Activates when
.csproj or .sln exists.
Skip
Return skip when no .cs files in the changeset.
Detect
Nullable reference types:
<Nullable>enable</Nullable>missing in.csproj- Null-forgiving operator (
!) used without safety check - Missing null checks at public API boundaries
dynamictype usage (loses type safety)
Async/await:
async voidmethods (except event handlers).Resultor.Wait()on tasks (deadlock risk)- Missing
ConfigureAwait(false)in library code - Fire-and-forget tasks without error handling
Modern C#:
- Classes used for DTOs where
recordtypes would be immutable and concise - Manual
Equals/GetHashCodewhererecordhandles it string.Formatinstead of string interpolationswitchstatements that could use pattern matching
Dependency injection:
new-ing services instead of injecting via constructor- Service locator anti-pattern (
IServiceProvider.GetServicein business logic) - Missing interface for testability
- Transient services holding state
Ignore
Test projects, generated code, migration files, Razor views.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 64 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 25e2678db708
csharp-quality is an agent published in the GitHub repository bdfinst/agentic-dev-team (296 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 456 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other agents, from other repositories
csharp-reviewer
Expert C# code reviewer specializing in .NET conventions, async patterns, security, nullable reference types, and performance. Use for all C# code changes. MUST BE USED for C# projects.
optimizing-dotnet-performance
Analyzes .NET code for performance bottlenecks, recommends concrete optimizations, and guides benchmarking. Scans for 50 anti-patterns across async, memory, strings, collections, LINQ, regex, serialization, and I/O. Use when reviewing .NET code performance, optimizing hot paths, reducing allocations, or tuning…
dotnet-cop
MUST delegate when user runs /cop-review or asks for pre-merge review of HEAD vs a target branch on a .NET project. .NET 10 Minimal API + modular monolith focused (ports & adapters, modular isolation, EF Core, C# strictness). Reads project AGENTS.md. Runs dotnet build + dotnet format --verify-no-changes. Tiered…
csharp-reviewer
C# 14 / .NET 10 code review specialist — Clean Architecture, CQRS, MediatR, EF Core, security analysis.
code-reviewer
Revisión de código .NET como quality gate antes de merge. Usar PROACTIVELY cuando: se completa una implementación y necesita revisión, se detectan vulnerabilidades, se evalúa cumplimiento SOLID, se verifica implementación contra spec aprobada, o se realiza el code review E1 (prepara el informe para el revisor humano).
SwiftlyS2-Edit
Development agent for the SwiftlyS2 / SW2 plugin ecosystem. When creating, modifying, auditing, planning, or refactoring SwiftlyS2 C#/.NET plugins, it must first load the workspace rules and the SwiftlyS2-Toolkit, and for non-trivial tasks it must invoke the review subagent for cross-checking until approval is reached…