Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bdfinst/agentic-dev-teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/front-end-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/front-end-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/front-end-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/front-end-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/front-end-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00533 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00213 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00107 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
front-end-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Front-End Testing
Output JSON:
{"status": "pass|warn|fail|skip", "issues": [{"severity": "error|warning|suggestion", "confidence": "high|medium|none", "file": "", "line": 0, "message": "", "suggestedFix": ""}], "summary": ""}
Status: pass=good testing practices, warn=anti-patterns, fail=tests unreliable or untestable Severity: error=unreliable test pattern, warning=anti-pattern, suggestion=improvement Confidence: high=mechanical (fix query priority); medium=test design; none=requires domain context
Context needs: full-file
File scope: *.test.ts, *.test.tsx, *.spec.ts, *.spec.tsx, *.test.js, *.test.jsx
Activates when
Any frontend framework detected (React, Vue, Svelte, Angular).
Skip
Return skip when no frontend test files in the changeset.
Detect
Query priority (most to least preferred):
getByRole— accessible queries firstgetByLabelText— form fieldsgetByPlaceholderText— fallback for unlabeled inputsgetByText— visible text contentgetByDisplayValue— current form valuesgetByAltText— imagesgetByTitle— title attributesgetByTestId— last resort only
Flag violations of this priority order.
Browser-mode preference:
- Prefer Vitest browser mode or Playwright component testing over jsdom
- Flag tests that depend on jsdom quirks (layout, intersection observer, etc.)
HTTP interceptors:
- Prefer MSW (Mock Service Worker) over manual fetch/XHR mocking
- Flag direct
jest.mockof fetch/axios — use interceptors for realistic testing - For Angular: prefer
HttpClientTestingModuleover manual spy injection
Behavior-driven:
- Tests should describe user behavior, not component internals
- Test names should read as scenarios ("when user clicks submit, form data is sent")
- Avoid testing CSS classes, internal state, or lifecycle methods directly
Ignore
Backend tests, E2E/integration tests, non-UI unit tests.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 66 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 80feea15ea74
front-end-testing is an agent published in the GitHub repository bdfinst/agentic-dev-team (295 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 533 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-implementer
Implementation specialist - executes tasks from plans with TDD methodology, writes tests, and validates acceptance criteria. Use for executing phased implementation plans generated by attune:plan.
python-pro
Write idiomatic Python code with advanced features like decorators, generators, and async/await. Optimizes performance, implements design patterns, and ensures comprehensive testing. Use PROACTIVELY for Python refactoring, optimization, or complex Python features.
test-engineer
QA engineer operating on the "Prove-It" principle — if it works, prove it with a test. Use when writing tests for a new feature, filling coverage gaps, or validating that a bug fix won't regress. Can read, write and edit test files. Dispatch with Task tool for isolated test work.
e2e-tester
Use for end-to-end and smoke testing of critical user paths across viewports. Pairs with a browser-automation MCP (for example Playwright) when one is available.
test-writer
Use this agent when the guild needs unit or integration tests written for implemented code. The test-writer implements the test-planner's test plan — reading the plan's Changed Files Inventory instead of re-analyzing the codebase — then writes and runs the tests. Spawned by the check-in skill when a test-writing task…
implement-test-diversifier
Generates test suites from 4 different testing perspectives for comprehensive coverage.