Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to bdfinst/agentic-dev-team. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/main/.claude/agents/python-quality.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bdfinst/agentic-dev-teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/python-quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/python-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/python-quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/python-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/python-quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00470 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00188 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00094 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
python-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Python Quality
Output JSON:
{"status": "pass|warn|fail|skip", "issues": [{"severity": "error|warning|suggestion", "confidence": "high|medium|none", "file": "", "line": 0, "message": "", "suggestedFix": ""}], "summary": ""}
Status: pass=clean Python, warn=improvements needed, fail=unsafe patterns Severity: error=bare except or type safety issue, warning=missing types or anti-pattern, suggestion=modern idiom Confidence: high=mechanical (add type hint, use f-string); medium=design choice; none=domain context needed
Context needs: diff-only
File scope: *.py
Activates when
pyproject.toml, requirements.txt, or setup.py exists.
Skip
Return skip when no .py files in the changeset.
Detect
Type hints:
- Missing type annotations on function signatures (public APIs must have types)
Anyused without justification- No
mypyorpyrightconfig for strict checking # type: ignorewithout explanation
Exception handling:
- Bare
except:orexcept Exception:without re-raise or specific handling - Silencing exceptions with
pass - Catching too broad (Exception when only ValueError is expected)
- Missing
frominraise ... fromchains
Modern idioms:
format()or%string formatting instead of f-strings- Manual dict/list construction instead of comprehensions
type()checks instead ofisinstance()- Mutable default arguments (
def f(x=[]))
Data modeling:
- Plain dicts where
dataclassorPydantic.BaseModelwould add type safety - Duplicate field definitions across multiple dicts
- Missing validation at API boundaries (use Pydantic for request/response)
Ignore
Django/Flask-specific patterns, test fixtures, script-only files, architecture.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 63 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 67f5ab6d6d5c
python-quality is an agent published in the GitHub repository bdfinst/agentic-dev-team (295 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 470 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
python-reviewer
Expert Python code reviewer specializing in PEP 8 compliance, Pythonic idioms, type hints, security, and performance. Use for all Python code changes. MUST BE USED for Python projects.
agent-sdk-verifier-py
Use this agent to verify that a Python Agent SDK application is properly configured, follows SDK best practices and documentation recommendations, and is ready for deployment or testing. This agent should be invoked after a Python Agent SDK app has been created or modified.
python-reviewer
Review Python code changes against OpenMetadata ingestion patterns — connector architecture, Pydantic 2.x models, pytest conventions, and schema-first design.
python-pro
Python 3.13 language expert for the ClosedLoop plugin monorepo. Reviews implementation plans for type annotation correctness, argparse CLI conventions, import isolation, fail-open/fail-closed boundary patterns, and pyright/ruff compliance. Produces type-patterns.md in legacy mode.
python-reviewer
Python 3.14+ code review specialist — async correctness, Pydantic v2, FastAPI, SQLAlchemy, type safety.
python-refactor-expert
Expert Python code refactoring specialist. Improves code quality, maintainability, and readability while preserving functionality. Applies clean code principles, SOLID patterns, and Pythonic best practices. Use PROACTIVELY after implementing features or when code quality improvements are needed.