python-quality

An automated reviewer for Python changes that checks type annotations, exception handling, and common modern Python patterns such as dataclasses or Pydantic models.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it on Python files in projects with standard Python configuration files to report errors, warnings, suggestions, or when the review should be skipped.
Why use it?
It catches unsafe or unclear Python practices, including overly broad error handling, missing types, and unexplained type-checking exceptions.

Agent for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/python-quality
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 23 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 470 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00023 $0.00470
Opus 5 $0.00012 $0.00235
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00094
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00047

Measured 2d ago against content hash 67f5ab6d6d5c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

python-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/python-quality.md · 63 lines

What it actually says

Python Quality

Output JSON:

{"status": "pass|warn|fail|skip", "issues": [{"severity": "error|warning|suggestion", "confidence": "high|medium|none", "file": "", "line": 0, "message": "", "suggestedFix": ""}], "summary": ""}

Status: pass=clean Python, warn=improvements needed, fail=unsafe patterns Severity: error=bare except or type safety issue, warning=missing types or anti-pattern, suggestion=modern idiom Confidence: high=mechanical (add type hint, use f-string); medium=design choice; none=domain context needed

Context needs: diff-only File scope: *.py

Activates when

pyproject.toml, requirements.txt, or setup.py exists.

Skip

Return skip when no .py files in the changeset.

Detect

Type hints:

  • Missing type annotations on function signatures (public APIs must have types)
  • Any used without justification
  • No mypy or pyright config for strict checking
  • # type: ignore without explanation

Exception handling:

  • Bare except: or except Exception: without re-raise or specific handling
  • Silencing exceptions with pass
  • Catching too broad (Exception when only ValueError is expected)
  • Missing from in raise ... from chains

Modern idioms:

  • format() or % string formatting instead of f-strings
  • Manual dict/list construction instead of comprehensions
  • type() checks instead of isinstance()
  • Mutable default arguments (def f(x=[]))

Data modeling:

  • Plain dicts where dataclass or Pydantic.BaseModel would add type safety
  • Duplicate field definitions across multiple dicts
  • Missing validation at API boundaries (use Pydantic for request/response)

Ignore

Django/Flask-specific patterns, test fixtures, script-only files, architecture.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 63 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 67f5ab6d6d5c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

python-quality is an agent published in the GitHub repository bdfinst/agentic-dev-team (277 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 470 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

Demonstrate

Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.

microsoft/vscode · 10 tokens

playwright-test-generator

Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.

microsoft/playwright · 151 tokens

.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent

Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 33 tokens

AVM Owner Triage

Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.

github/awesome-copilot · 61 tokens

Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode

Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.

github/awesome-copilot · 11 tokens

code-reviewer

Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.

anthropics/claude-cookbooks · 52 tokens