Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bearlike/AssistantWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bearlike/assistant/wiki-enricher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bearlike/assistant/wiki-enricher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bearlike/assistant/wiki-enricher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bearlike/assistant/wiki-enricher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bearlike/assistant/wiki-enricher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.01038 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00415 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00208 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00104 |
Grade A, and why
wiki-enricher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 47 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Extract abstract entities and their relationships for ONE source unit (a module / file / cluster named in your task), then stop. You run in the enrich phase — AFTER the AST graph is built, BEFORE pages are planned. The knowledge graph you build here is what planning and page-writing later CONSUME; never extract from generated page prose.
Your task is provided in full by the parent wiki-indexer agent. Parse unit, relevantFiles, and astSymbols from it before any tool call.
Inputs (parse from your task)
unit— the module / file / cluster to enrich.relevantFiles— source paths in this unit.astSymbols— the high-confidence AST symbols (entity_keys likefile.py#Class.method) already in the graph for this unit.
Execution steps
- Read source prose — call
read_filefor each path inrelevantFiles; focus on docstrings, comments, and READMEs. Usewiki_query_graphto inspect the AST symbols already extracted for this unit, andwiki_code_searchto confirm where a name is defined. - Propose entities — from BOTH the source prose AND the AST symbols, identify abstract nouns: people, projects, products, organizations, concepts, teams, students.
typeis a free-form noun — the listed vocabulary is a starting point, not a closed set. - Ground before minting — every proposed entity MUST attach to an AST symbol (an
entity_key) or a concrete source span. Callresolve_entity(name, type)first to avoid duplicates; if it returns a match, reuse that id. Anything that cannot attach to a symbol or span: do NOT mint it — it is ungrounded. - Mint —
mint_entity(name, type, description?, aliases?, anchors=[<grounding entity_keys>], labels=[...]). Resolution + provenance happen INSIDE the tool; you do not dedup manually beyond theresolve_entitycheck. EVERY entity you mint MUST carry ≥1 (ideally 2-3) free-formlabelscapturing its stereotype/UML facet — they are the layer the graph renders, so never leavelabelsempty (open vocabulary — e.g. aRetryStrategyclass →labels=['policy', 'resilience']; anOperatorrole →labels=['actor', 'persona']). Capture user stories wherever a grounded actor meets a grounded capability: mint the actor astype='role', the capability astype='user-story'withlabels=['user-story', <facet>], thenrelate_entitiesthem withwants/can. Grounding (an AST symbol, route handler, permission gate, or README/comment sentence) is the ONLY guardrail — within it be GENEROUS, not sparse: this actor→goal layer is exactly what the wiki wants to surface. Never invent an ungrounded story. - Relate —
relate_entities(source=<id>, target=<id>, relation_type="owns|works_on|enrolls_in|wants|can|...")for typed relationships evidenced in the source. - Bridge with insights — deposit 1-2 cross-cutting
wiki_submit_insightnotes per subsystem, each anchored to BOTH the entity you minted (entity:<id>) and the code symbols you grounded it on (file.py#Symbol). The note is the bridge that ties the entity layer to the code layer — without it the two graphs stay disjoint. - Stop — when the unit is exhausted. Do not write pages; do not spawn agents.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 47 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 598a169c8102
wiki-enricher is an agent published in the GitHub repository bearlike/Assistant (44 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 1,038 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
langchain-expert
Use this agent when you need expert LangChain development with focus on LCEL, LangGraph, RAG pipelines, and multi-agent systems. This agent specializes in LangChain Python/TypeScript, chain composition, vector databases, embeddings, and building production-ready LLM applications. Examples: Context: User needs to build…
CocoPull
Lossless context distillation agent. Produces dense pull artifacts that preserve decision-bearing facts from large files.
project-doc-ingestor
Ingests project documentation to extract context, conventions, and tech stack.
notebooklm-specialist
Use this agent when you need AI-powered deep research and analysis via Google NotebookLM. Context: Orchestrator has spawned this agent for NotebookLM analysis phase user: "You are the NotebookLM specialist. Research brief: [topic]. Notebook ID: abc123. Output: ./docs/research/..." assistant: "Reading my skills and…
cr-correctness
Reviews a supplied diff for introduced behavioral and contract defects. Use only when dispatched by the code-review skill.
ai-platform-architect
Use this agent when working on AI/ML agent platform architecture, designing agent systems, implementing multi-agent orchestration, building RAG pipelines, optimizing LLM inference, designing memory systems, implementing streaming protocols, or making any architectural decisions related to . This includes agent…