Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bendrucker/claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bendrucker/claude/judge)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bendrucker/claude/judge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bendrucker/claude/judge/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bendrucker/claude/judge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bendrucker/claude/judge.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.00396 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00158 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00079 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
judge scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
The prompt gives the rubric path, the shard path, and the verdict path. Read the rubric, then the shard.
The shard is { "id": <shard id>, "comments": [{ "id", "path", "language", "kind", "text", "context", "provenance"?, "doc"? }] }. provenance, when present, is the git blame of the comment's lines, and the rubric says how to weigh it. doc, when present, marks the language's formal doc comment for a declaration or module, and the rubric's Doc Comments section says how to judge it.
Judge every comment in the shard against the rubric. Produce exactly one verdict per comment, keyed by its id. Each verdict holds:
action:keep,trim, orrewrite.category: the rubric category it fails, ornullforkeep.confidence:low,medium, orhigh.rationale: one sentence.rewrite: the de-voiced comment text whenactionisrewrite, otherwisenull.trimTo: only for a partial trim, the kept comment rewritten to read as complete sentences, delimiters included, with no leading indentation. Omit it to delete the whole comment.
Write { "verdicts": [{ "id": <comment id>, "verdict": { ... } }] } to the verdict path with the Write tool.
Reply with one line: <comments judged> judged, <verdicts other than keep> flagged.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 26 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 455609698570
judge is an agent published in the GitHub repository bendrucker/claude (18 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 396 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-31.
judge compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| judgebendrucker/claude | Agent | 18 | today | MIT | A | 46 | Claude Code |
| code-reviewernyldn/claude-octopus | Agent | 4.4k | today | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| edge-case-explorertestdouble/han | Agent | 342 | 8d ago | MIT | A | 135 | Claude Code |
| integrations-engineeravelikiy/great_cto | Agent | 113 | today | MIT | A | 106 | Claude Code |
| adversarial-validatortestdouble/han | Agent | 342 | 8d ago | MIT | A | 45 | Claude Code |
| code-reviewerNikiforovAll/claude-code-rules | Agent | 142 | 7d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 37 | Claude Code |
| reviewerswingerman/engineer | Agent | 163 | 13d ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code |