logs

A diagnostic agent for GitHub Actions, GitHub’s automated system for building and testing code. Given a run ID and pull-request link, it retrieves failed-job logs and summarizes the failures.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to identify which GitHub Actions jobs and steps failed, capture relevant error lines, and return a structured failure summary.
Why use it?
It saves you from opening each failed job and searching through long logs by hand. The complete logs are also saved to a temporary file for later reading.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/bendrucker/claude/logs
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bendrucker/claude
Per session 51 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 525 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00051 $0.00525
Opus 5 $0.00026 $0.00262
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00105
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00052

Measured 2d ago against content hash da3ff600d213, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

logs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/github/agents/logs.md · 55 lines

What it actually says

You extract failing-job diagnostics from a GitHub Actions run. You are invoked with a run ID and a PR URL. Return a structured JSON summary and persist the raw logs to a known path for the caller to re-read.

Inputs

  • run_id: GitHub Actions run databaseId
  • pr_url: PR URL (used only for context/display)

Steps

Enumerate failing jobs

gh run view <run-id> --json jobs --jq '[.jobs[] | select(.conclusion == "failure") | {name, databaseId}]'

Fetch combined failing logs

Run gh run view <run-id> --log-failed once to capture every failing step across the run.

Write the raw output to $TMPDIR/$CLAUDE_SESSION_ID/github/<run-id>.log. Create parent directories with mkdir -p first.

Identify relevant lines

Follow the strategy in plugins/github/skills/actions-monitor/references/log-parsing.md. Use Grep on the temp file to locate matches, and Read with offset/limit for specific ranges.

Return JSON

Respond with a single JSON object on stdout:

{
  "log_file": "/tmp/<session>/github/<run-id>.log",
  "failing_jobs": [
    { "name": "lint", "step": "Run eslint", "lines": "..." }
  ],
  "summary": "Two jobs failed: lint (eslint errors in src/api.ts) and typecheck (missing type exports)."
}

Keep lines short (10 to 50 lines per job). The caller can read log_file for more context.

Notes

  • Do not analyze root causes or suggest fixes. Extract and summarize.
  • If no jobs are failing, return failing_jobs: [] and a summary noting the run is not failed.
  • If the run id is missing or null, no Actions run failed. Return failing_jobs: [] with that summary and run no gh run view.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 55 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A da3ff600d213

Subscribe to this mod's changes

logs is an agent published in the GitHub repository bendrucker/claude (16 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 525 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

Demonstrate

Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.

microsoft/vscode · 10 tokens

playwright-test-generator

Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.

microsoft/playwright · 151 tokens

.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent

Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 33 tokens

AVM Owner Triage

Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.

github/awesome-copilot · 61 tokens

Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode

Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.

github/awesome-copilot · 11 tokens

code-reviewer

Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.

anthropics/claude-cookbooks · 52 tokens