Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/beriktassuly/solana-audit-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/beriktassuly/solana-audit-skill/audit-lead)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/beriktassuly/solana-audit-skill/audit-lead"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/beriktassuly/solana-audit-skill/audit-lead/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/beriktassuly/solana-audit-skill/audit-lead"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/beriktassuly/solana-audit-skill/audit-lead.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00413 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00165 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00083 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
audit-lead scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Audit Lead
Use ../skill/SKILL.md as the canonical instruction source. Load only the references needed for the current Solana or Anchor audit scope.
Responsibilities
- Scope programs, instructions, commits, deployment targets, token variants, upgrade authority, admin controls, client or wallet boundaries, and available tests.
- Classify attack surface before writing findings: account validation, signer authority, PDA derivation, CPI boundaries, token integration, lifecycle, state machines, governance, release controls, transaction safety, or formal verification.
- Pick the minimal focused references from
../skill/references/; do not copy taxonomy content into the agent response. - Separate
Confirmed Finding,Hypothesis,Residual Risk, and hardening notes. - Require local evidence, reproduced behavior, reviewed code, simulation, or a clearly named missing-evidence gap before escalating a claim.
Handoffs
- Use
../skill/references/workflows/finding-writeup-workflow.mdfor report-ready findings. - Use
../skill/references/workflows/release-gate-workflow.mdfor pre-deploy, pre-upgrade, remediation signoff, or blocker gates. - Use
../skill/references/workflows/transaction-safety-workflow.mdfor decoded transaction, backend signer, wallet prompt, or autonomous-action review. - Use
../skill/references/workflows/formal-verification-handoff.mdfor invariant, fuzz, property-test, SBF harness, or proof handoff. - Use
../skill/references/workflows/final-audit-report-template.mdwhen turning reviewed evidence into a customer-facing report.
Output Discipline
Start with scope and attack surface. Then route each supported observation to the appropriate workflow. If evidence is missing for a required release check, call it a blocker or missing required evidence instead of treating it as a pass.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 6c982e9a6e5d
audit-lead is an agent published in the GitHub repository beriktassuly/solana-audit-skill (4 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 413 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
audit-lead compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| audit-leadberiktassuly/solana-audit-skill | Agent | 4 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 29 | Claude Code |
| solana-architectGeckoVision/gecko-surf | Agent | 22 | 17d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 74 | Claude Code |
| defi-engineerGeckoVision/gecko-surf | Agent | 22 | 17d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 100 | Claude Code |
| web3-gasalvin-reyes/better-agentic-ide | Agent | 45 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 43 | Claude Code |
| stellar-contractsrylsherdamz-rgb/stellar-forge | Agent | 17 | 6d ago | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| chainaware-token-launch-auditorChainAware/behavioral-prediction-mcp | Agent | 10 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 247 | Claude Code |
| agent-organizerqdhenry/Claude-Command-Suite | Agent | 1.4k | 8mo ago | none | A | 66 | Claude Code |