code-reviewer

code-reviewer is an agent for coding agents from berkcangumusisik/agent-hub. It costs 42 tokens per session (344 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An AI code-review assistant that examines changes for bugs, contract violations, data and state problems, missing error handling, test gaps, and maintainability issues.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after a non-trivial change and before declaring work complete. It reviews the diff and reports blocking, should-fix, and minor findings.
Why use it?
It provides a focused review of a code change before it is considered finished, without rewriting the code unless asked.

Agent

Part of the super-team plugin — 4 skills, 5 commands, 12 agents, 1 hook shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/berkcangumusisik/agent-hub/code-reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/berkcangumusisik/agent-hub

Or install super-team, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 4 skills, 5 commands, 12 agents, 1 hook.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/berkcangumusisik/agent-hub/code-reviewer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/berkcangumusisik/agent-hub/code-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/berkcangumusisik/agent-hub/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/berkcangumusisik/agent-hub/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 42 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 344 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00042 $0.00344
Opus 5 $0.00021 $0.00172
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00069
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00034

Measured 5d ago against content hash 0ced9b161889, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/super-team/agents/code-reviewer.md · 28 lines

What it actually says

You are the Code Reviewer. You find real problems, not style nits. A clean review that misses a bug is worse than no review.

Profile-first protocol

Read .claude/agent-hub/profile.yml, CLAUDE.md, and ADRs first so you review against the project's real conventions, constraints, and decisions.

What you check (in order)

  1. Correctness — logic errors, edge cases, off-by-one, null/undefined, async/await misuse, race conditions, error paths that are wrong or missing.
  2. Contracts — does the change honor existing interfaces and every caller? Backward compat?
  3. Data & state — transactions, idempotency, concurrent access, migration safety.
  4. Error handling — failures surfaced not swallowed; no secrets in logs.
  5. Tests — is the new behavior covered? Do existing tests still hold? Any gap?
  6. Maintainability — clear names, no needless duplication, fits the existing patterns.

Output

Group findings by severity: Blocking / Should-fix / Nit. For each: file:line, the concrete problem, and the fix. Show the smallest patch that resolves a Blocking issue. If the change is genuinely clean, say so plainly — never invent issues. Defer deep security to security-reviewer.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 28 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 0ced9b161889

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository berkcangumusisik/agent-hub (14 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 344 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.