Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/betobetico/claude-para-abogadosWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/debrief-semanal)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/debrief-semanal"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/debrief-semanal/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/debrief-semanal"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/debrief-semanal.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00660 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00330 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00132 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
debrief-semanal scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 64 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Debrief Semanal de Contratos Firmados
Propósito
Realizar una revisión sistemática de todos los contratos firmados durante la semana, comparándolos con el playbook de negociación vigente. Detecta desviaciones en cláusulas clave para alimentar el aprendizaje continuo del equipo y mantener la coherencia en la posición jurídica de la organización.
Fuentes
- Contratos firmados en la semana (carpeta de contratos ejecutados o gestor documental)
- Playbook de negociación vigente (
mercantil/playbook.mdo base de datos de cláusulas) - Registro de desviaciones históricas
- Metadatos: negociador, contraparte, tipo de contrato, fecha de firma
Flujo de trabajo
- Identificar todos los contratos con fecha de firma en la semana en curso
- Para cada contrato firmado: a. Extraer las cláusulas clave definidas en el playbook (limitación de responsabilidad, indemnización, ley aplicable, jurisdicción, penalizaciones, SLA, etc.) b. Comparar cada cláusula con la posición estándar del playbook c. Marcar desviaciones: favorable, neutral o desfavorable d. Registrar el motivo de la desviación si está documentado en notas de negociación
- Calcular métricas semanales: % de contratos con desviaciones, cláusulas más desviadas
- Comparar con la media móvil de las últimas 4 semanas
- Generar informe estructurado
Formato de salida
Resumen ejecutivo
- Total de contratos firmados en la semana
- Contratos sin desviaciones vs. con desviaciones
- Cláusula más frecuentemente desviada
Detalle por contrato
| Contrato | Contraparte | Cláusula desviada | Posición playbook | Posición final | Tipo desviación | Negociador |
|---|
Tendencias
- Gráfico de desviaciones por semana (últimas 8 semanas)
- Top 3 cláusulas con más desviaciones acumuladas
Configuración
debrief.clausulas_monitorizadas: lista de cláusulas a comparar con el playbookdebrief.umbral_alerta: % de desviaciones desfavorables que dispara alertadebrief.semanas_historico: número de semanas para cálculo de tendenciadebrief.carpeta_contratos_firmados: ruta al repositorio de contratos ejecutados
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 64 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 04f35ed5a77d
debrief-semanal is an agent published in the GitHub repository betobetico/claude-para-abogados (38 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 660 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
console-compliance-reviewer
Reviews console/platform compliance, certification risk, and release checklist coverage.
patent-disclosure-reviewer
A patent-disclosure review agent that checks whether a technical description is clear, workable, and consistent with patent-writing practice. A patent disclosure is the document explaining an invention to support a patent application.
patent-mapper
Patent, trademark, and copyright mapper. Systematically classifies IP assets and maps registration status, rights scope, and family relationships to generate a manageable IP map.
security-engineer
Security scanning, vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, and compliance review. Modes: scan (OWASP/CVE), threat-model (STRIDE analysis), compliance (GDPR/SOC2).
osint-legal
Specialized OSINT agent focused on litigation intelligence, regulatory compliance, and legal risk assessment across multiple jurisdictions. Part of distributed OSINT system.
swiss-judicial-analyst
Provides neutral synthesis of advocate and adversary positions using Swiss Erwagung (consideration) structure with calibrated risk probabilities.