Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/betobetico/claude-para-abogadosWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/monitor-ia)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/monitor-ia"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/monitor-ia/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/monitor-ia"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/monitor-ia.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00771 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00385 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00154 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
monitor-ia scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 76 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Monitor de Regulación de IA
Propósito
Realizar un seguimiento semanal de los avances en la regulación de inteligencia artificial a nivel europeo y español. Monitoriza la implementación del Reglamento europeo de IA (AI Act), las actualizaciones de la Agencia Española de Supervisión de la Inteligencia Artificial (AESIA), y otros desarrollos normativos relevantes para mantener actualizado el registro interno de sistemas de IA.
Fuentes
- DOUE: publicaciones relacionadas con el AI Act y actos delegados
- BOE: transposición y desarrollo normativo nacional en materia de IA
- AESIA (Agencia Española de Supervisión de IA): guías, resoluciones, comunicados
- Comisión Europea: actos delegados, normas armonizadas, sandbox regulatorios
- AI Pact y compromisos voluntarios de la industria
- Comité Europeo de Inteligencia Artificial: dictámenes y recomendaciones
- AEPD: intersección IA y protección de datos
- Sandbox regulatorio español de IA
Flujo de trabajo
- Rastrear fuentes configuradas en busca de novedades regulatorias en IA
- Para cada novedad detectada: a. Clasificar por tipo: legislación, guía, resolución, sandbox, estándar técnico b. Evaluar relevancia para el registro interno de sistemas de IA c. Identificar si afecta a sistemas clasificados como alto riesgo d. Determinar si modifica obligaciones de conformidad existentes e. Vincular con sistemas de IA registrados internamente
- Revisar el calendario de implementación del AI Act: a. Hitos ya cumplidos vs. próximos b. Plazos transitorios aplicables a cada categoría de riesgo
- Verificar si hay actualizaciones en la lista de prácticas prohibidas o de alto riesgo
- Generar informe semanal con impacto en el registro interno
Formato de salida
Novedades regulatorias de la semana
| Novedad | Fuente | Tipo | Fecha | Sistemas afectados | Impacto | Acción requerida |
|---|
Calendario de implementación del AI Act
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 76 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A db5a980096dd
monitor-ia is an agent published in the GitHub repository betobetico/claude-para-abogados (38 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 771 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
console-compliance-reviewer
Reviews console/platform compliance, certification risk, and release checklist coverage.
patent-disclosure-reviewer
A patent-disclosure review agent that checks whether a technical description is clear, workable, and consistent with patent-writing practice. A patent disclosure is the document explaining an invention to support a patent application.
patent-mapper
Patent, trademark, and copyright mapper. Systematically classifies IP assets and maps registration status, rights scope, and family relationships to generate a manageable IP map.
security-engineer
Security scanning, vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, and compliance review. Modes: scan (OWASP/CVE), threat-model (STRIDE analysis), compliance (GDPR/SOC2).
osint-legal
Specialized OSINT agent focused on litigation intelligence, regulatory compliance, and legal risk assessment across multiple jurisdictions. Part of distributed OSINT system.
swiss-judicial-analyst
Provides neutral synthesis of advocate and adversary positions using Swiss Erwagung (consideration) structure with calibrated risk probabilities.