Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/betobetico/claude-para-abogadosWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/monitor-playbook)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/monitor-playbook"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/monitor-playbook/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/monitor-playbook"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/monitor-playbook.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00714 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00357 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00143 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
monitor-playbook scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Monitor del Playbook de Negociación
Propósito
Identificar patrones recurrentes en las desviaciones registradas respecto al playbook de negociación mercantil. Cuando una posición estándar se desvía consistentemente, el agente propone una actualización formal del playbook, evitando que las posiciones queden desactualizadas respecto a la práctica real de negociación.
Fuentes
- Registro de desviaciones acumulado (generado por
debrief-semanal) - Playbook de negociación vigente (
mercantil/playbook.md) - Histórico de versiones del playbook
- Informes de debrief semanal de los últimos 3 meses
- Notas de negociación con motivos de desviación
Flujo de trabajo
- Cargar todas las desviaciones registradas en el último mes (o trimestre, según configuración)
- Agrupar desviaciones por cláusula y tipo (favorable / neutral / desfavorable)
- Para cada cláusula con desviaciones recurrentes: a. Calcular frecuencia de desviación (% de contratos que la desvían) b. Identificar la posición final más habitual (moda) c. Analizar si la tendencia es estable o creciente d. Revisar los motivos documentados
- Filtrar cláusulas que superan el umbral de recurrencia configurado
- Para cada cláusula candidata, redactar propuesta de actualización:
- Posición actual del playbook
- Posición propuesta (basada en la práctica real)
- Justificación con datos (frecuencia, tendencia, motivos)
- Impacto estimado en futuras negociaciones
- Priorizar propuestas por impacto y frecuencia
Formato de salida
Resumen de actividad
- Total de desviaciones analizadas en el período
- Cláusulas con patrón detectado
Propuestas de actualización
Para cada propuesta:
| Campo | Contenido |
|---|---|
| Cláusula | Nombre de la cláusula |
| Posición actual | Texto vigente en el playbook |
| Posición propuesta | Nueva redacción sugerida |
| Frecuencia de desviación | X% de contratos en el período |
| Tendencia | Estable / Creciente / Decreciente |
| Motivos principales | Listado de razones documentadas |
| Prioridad | Alta / Media / Baja |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 74 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 233e7d9f13e6
monitor-playbook is an agent published in the GitHub repository betobetico/claude-para-abogados (38 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 714 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
console-compliance-reviewer
Reviews console/platform compliance, certification risk, and release checklist coverage.
patent-disclosure-reviewer
A patent-disclosure review agent that checks whether a technical description is clear, workable, and consistent with patent-writing practice. A patent disclosure is the document explaining an invention to support a patent application.
patent-mapper
Patent, trademark, and copyright mapper. Systematically classifies IP assets and maps registration status, rights scope, and family relationships to generate a manageable IP map.
security-engineer
Security scanning, vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, and compliance review. Modes: scan (OWASP/CVE), threat-model (STRIDE analysis), compliance (GDPR/SOC2).
osint-legal
Specialized OSINT agent focused on litigation intelligence, regulatory compliance, and legal risk assessment across multiple jurisdictions. Part of distributed OSINT system.
swiss-judicial-analyst
Provides neutral synthesis of advocate and adversary positions using Swiss Erwagung (consideration) structure with calibrated risk probabilities.