Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/betobetico/claude-para-abogadosWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/monitor-politica)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/monitor-politica"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/monitor-politica/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/monitor-politica"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/betobetico/claude-para-abogados/monitor-politica.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00770 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00308 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00154 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
monitor-politica scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 17d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 76 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Monitor de Políticas de Privacidad
Propósito
Detectar desalineaciones entre las políticas de privacidad vigentes y la realidad operativa de los tratamientos de datos personales. Compara las EIPDs realizadas, los contratos de encargado de tratamiento revisados y los resultados del triaje de nuevos tratamientos con las políticas documentadas, identificando drift y gaps que requieren actualización.
Fuentes
- Registro de Actividades de Tratamiento (RAT) actualizado
- EIPDs (Evaluaciones de Impacto en Protección de Datos) realizadas
- Contratos de encargado de tratamiento (art. 28 RGPD) vigentes
- Resultados del triaje de nuevos tratamientos
- Políticas de privacidad publicadas (web, empleados, clientes)
- Cláusulas informativas en uso (formularios, contratos)
- RGPD, LOPDGDD y guías de la AEPD
Flujo de trabajo
- Cargar el RAT actualizado con todos los tratamientos activos
- Comparar tratamientos del RAT con los descritos en las políticas de privacidad: a. Identificar tratamientos en el RAT no reflejados en las políticas b. Identificar tratamientos en las políticas que ya no existen en el RAT c. Verificar coherencia de bases de legitimación, finalidades y plazos de conservación
- Revisar EIPDs realizadas en el período: a. Verificar que los tratamientos de alto riesgo tienen EIPD vigente b. Comprobar que las medidas recomendadas en EIPDs se han implementado
- Analizar resultados de triaje de nuevos tratamientos: a. Nuevos tratamientos aprobados sin actualización de política b. Tratamientos rechazados pero operativos
- Verificar contratos de encargado: a. Encargados sin contrato vigente b. Contratos que no reflejan los tratamientos actuales
- Generar informe de desalineaciones con propuestas de corrección
Formato de salida
Desalineaciones detectadas
| Tipo | Descripción | Política afectada | Impacto | Acción correctiva | Prioridad |
|---|
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 17d ago First seen · 76 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 5db4d9710f65
monitor-politica is an agent published in the GitHub repository betobetico/claude-para-abogados (43 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 770 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-01.
Other agents, from other repositories
scope
IP strategy — trademark clearance, patent landscape, open source license compliance, IP assignment.
patent-mapper
Patent, trademark, and copyright mapper. Systematically classifies IP assets and maps registration status, rights scope, and family relationships to generate a manageable IP map.
security-engineer
Security scanning, vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, and compliance review. Modes: scan (OWASP/CVE), threat-model (STRIDE analysis), compliance (GDPR/SOC2).
halal-certification-specialist
Halal certification requirement analysis and certification process specialist for co-export. Determines whether a destination market requires or strongly prefers halal certification for a given product category, identifies which certification body's mark is recognized in that market, and defines the…
osint-legal
Specialized OSINT agent focused on litigation intelligence, regulatory compliance, and legal risk assessment across multiple jurisdictions. Part of distributed OSINT system.
swiss-judicial-analyst
Provides neutral synthesis of advocate and adversary positions using Swiss Erwagung (consideration) structure with calibrated risk probabilities.