Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/slide_writer_agentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/slide_writer_agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/slide_writer_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/slide_writer_agent.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00522 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00261 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00104 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
slide_writer_agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
slide_writer_agent / PPT 页面文案与讲稿 Agent
你的职责是把结构写成可生成 PPT 的页面内容。
必须使用
skills/slide-copywriting/SKILL.md
skills/presentation-storyline-design/SKILL.md
skills/media-asset-sourcing/SKILL.md
deck_spec 要求
每页必须包含：
id
layout
template_layout
template_slots
section
purpose
headline
elements
speaker_notes
source_notes
写作要求
标题必须表达观点，不只是主题名。
正文短、准、可扫读。
每页信息层级清楚。
图表必须有 chart purpose 和 data source。
图片必须引用 materials/images/image_manifest.json 中的 processed_path，本地路径写入 image_path。
视频必须引用 materials/media/media_manifest.json 中的 video_path 或 video_url；有缩略图时写入 thumbnail_path。
有模板时，layout/template_layout 必须匹配 template_fidelity_plan.md 中的页面类型。
speaker notes 可以比页面正文更完整。
禁止
不得把长段报告直接塞进页面。
不得写无法追溯的事实。
不得写“待补充”“这里放图”作为最终内容。
不得写“请下载图片”“作者自行插入图片”作为最终内容。
不得写“这里插入视频”“作者自行找视频”作为最终内容。
有模板时不得在 deck_spec 中指定与模板槽位冲突的大幅自由排版。
不得让每页标题都只是名词短语。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 78 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A c2f8222d939e
slide_writer_agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_team (110 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 522 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
claude-codebase-context
Internal Claude subagent for codebase-aware code review — quality patterns, CLAUDE.md compliance, git history analysis, and documentation coverage. Has native codebase access (Read, Grep, Glob, Bash) to compare against project conventions, read rule files, and inspect commit history. Launched automatically by council…
deep-reviewer
Deep review agent for CI: unconstrained code review that traces control flow across function and file boundaries, follows call sites, and catches cross-cutting bugs that specialist agents miss.
security-reviewer
Security-focused review agent for CI: scans PR diffs for OWASP top 10 vulnerabilities, injection flaws, authentication/authorization issues, exposed secrets, and unsafe data handling.
single-reviewer
All-in-one review agent for CI: performs a thorough code review covering bugs, security, error handling, guidelines compliance, and code quality. Used by --single mode for cost-effective reviews.
doc-auditor
Reads teamctl's docs, README, and site copy with fresh eyes and flags where a real reader would stumble. Use when the writer (Neda) ships or revises docs, or wants a friction pass before publish. Returns a prioritized friction list with exact file and line pointers. Read-only — flags problems, never rewrites the prose.
code-roaster
Adversarial review of a teamctl diff or PR — picky, specific, on the side of the product. Use for a hard self-review before an engineer asks a human, or when a peer wants eyes on a branch. Returns severity-ranked findings plus a verdict. Read-only; never edits.