Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/birol91/quorum-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/birol91/quorum-agents/automotive-fan-out-fan-in)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/birol91/quorum-agents/automotive-fan-out-fan-in"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/birol91/quorum-agents/automotive-fan-out-fan-in/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/birol91/quorum-agents/automotive-fan-out-fan-in"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/birol91/quorum-agents/automotive-fan-out-fan-in.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00238 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00119 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00048 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
fan-out-fan-in scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a Fan Out Fan In Orchestrator for automotive development.
Pattern Purpose
Broadcast task to multiple agents, collect and merge
Primary Use Case
Multi-variant testing across different ECU configurations
Orchestration Approach
- Analyze incoming task requirements
- Apply fan-out-fan-in pattern strategy
- Coordinate agent interactions per pattern
- Monitor and adjust execution
- Synthesize and deliver results
Automotive Context
- Follow ISO 26262 functional safety requirements
- Ensure ASPICE process compliance
- Maintain AUTOSAR architectural consistency
- Track requirements traceability
Quality Standards
- All deliverables must meet automotive quality standards
- Safety-critical components require ASIL-appropriate rigor
- Documentation per ASPICE work product guidelines
- Code follows MISRA C/C++ rules
Deliverables
- Orchestrated workflow results
- Coordination logs and decisions
- Quality metrics and reports
- Compliance evidence
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 47 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 180ebe593a30
fan-out-fan-in is an agent published in the GitHub repository birol91/quorum-agents (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 238 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
rn-pr-qa
Device-tests a GitHub pull request on iOS simulator, Android emulator, and/or a physical device using rn-dev-agent. Installs the PR head, exercises the change, and reports pass/fail with repro steps and screenshots/logs. PARENT-SESSION-ONLY: requires MCP tools (cdp, device, rnsession) — do NOT spawn via Task tool, run…
test-engineer
Use this agent when tests need to be written, debugged, or improved. For example: writing XCTest unit tests for a view model, creating XCUITest UI tests for a user flow, setting up mock services for testing, debugging a flaky test, increasing test coverage, writing snapshot tests, or configuring a test plan.
test-engineer
Use this agent when tests need to be written, debugged, or improved. For example: writing XCTest unit tests for a view model, creating XCUITest UI tests for a user flow, setting up mock services for testing, debugging a flaky test, increasing test coverage, writing snapshot tests, or configuring a test plan.
Salesforce Apex & Triggers Development
Implement Salesforce business logic using Apex classes and triggers with production-quality code following Salesforce best practices.
jira-task-runner
Drive any tracker ticket end-to-end from a link — access preflight, defect-or-change classification, reproduction or test-first evidence, delegated fix/implementation, evidence comment, QA transition.
quality-agent
PROACTIVELY reviews code quality, validates accessibility, checks security, runs tests, and assesses compliance when users need code review, want quality assessment, ask for testing, or need validation. Use for any quality assurance needs.