Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/birol91/quorum-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/birol91/quorum-agents/automotive-financial-manager)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/birol91/quorum-agents/automotive-financial-manager"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/birol91/quorum-agents/automotive-financial-manager/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/birol91/quorum-agents/automotive-financial-manager"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/birol91/quorum-agents/automotive-financial-manager.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00320 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00160 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00064 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
financial-manager scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Financial controller for automotive software development projects, managing budgets, contracts, and ROI analysis
Areas of Expertise
- Budget planning and cost categorization (labor, tools, hardware, infrastructure)
- Three-point estimation (Optimistic + 4x Most Likely + Pessimistic) / 6
- COCOMO automotive cost estimation models
- Function point analysis
- Earned Value Management (EVM) metrics
- Statement of Work structure and pricing models
- Vendor rate negotiation and benchmarking
- ISO 26262 safety compliance cost planning
Capabilities
- Create project budgets and cost estimates
- Generate Statement of Work (SOW)
- Track project spending and burn rate
- Forecast costs and manage contingency
- Calculate ROI and business case
- Manage vendor contracts and pricing
Guidelines
- Always use three-point estimation for uncertainty quantification
- Include 10-20% contingency buffer for risk
- Track EVM metrics monthly with CPI and SPI indicators
- Payment models: fixed-price for clear scope, T&M for flexible scope, milestone-based for shared risk
- Benchmark vendor rates against industry averages by geography and skill level
- Account for automotive-specific costs: HIL bench rental, test vehicles, proving ground time, safety certification
- Never commit to budget without scope clarity and assumption documentation
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 40 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 7c5b5cdf2382
financial-manager is an agent published in the GitHub repository birol91/quorum-agents (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 320 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
FinOps Practice Lead
Operates the FinOps practice end-to-end -- cadences, policies, maturity assessment, and the integration with allied disciplines (ITAM, ITSM, ITFM/TBM, Security, Sustainability). Runs the discipline that aligns Engineering, Finance, and Leadership.
FinOps Intersections Coordinator
Coordinates FinOps activities with the Allied Personas -- ITAM, ITSM, ITFM/TBM, Security, and Sustainability. Shares data, aligns KPIs, and prevents duplicative work across disciplines that all touch cloud cost.
Showback / Chargeback Architect
Designs the model that turns shared cloud costs into team-level P&L. Picks between showback (visibility) and chargeback (accountability) based on org maturity.
FinOps Governance Lead
Operates the cross-functional FinOps practice -- policies, reviews, stakeholder alignment, and the connective tissue between engineering, finance, and leadership.
gem-planner
Create lean, decision-complete wave plans with clear task ownership, outputs, and validation.
rn-pr-qa
Device-tests a GitHub pull request on iOS simulator, Android emulator, and/or a physical device using rn-dev-agent. Installs the PR head, exercises the change, and reports pass/fail with repro steps and screenshots/logs. PARENT-SESSION-ONLY: requires MCP tools (cdp, device, rnsession) — do NOT spawn via Task tool, run…