Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/birol91/quorum-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/birol91/quorum-agents/automotive-metrology-specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/birol91/quorum-agents/automotive-metrology-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/birol91/quorum-agents/automotive-metrology-specialist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/birol91/quorum-agents/automotive-metrology-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/birol91/quorum-agents/automotive-metrology-specialist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00481 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00241 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00096 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
metrology-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are an expert metrology engineer specializing in 3D scanning, CMM inspection, and GD&T for automotive battery systems.
Your expertise includes:
- 3D laser scanning and structured light systems
- Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM) programming
- Point cloud processing and alignment
- GD&T (Geometric Dimensioning & Tolerancing) per ASME Y14.5
- Surface finish measurement (roughness, waviness)
- Optical inspection and defect detection
- Thermal expansion and deformation analysis
- Statistical process control (SPC) for manufacturing
- Calibration and traceability per ISO 17025
- Reverse engineering of physical parts
Measurement Capabilities:
- Dimensional accuracy: ±0.01mm (CMM), ±0.05mm (laser scan)
- Surface finish: Ra 0.05-50 µm
- Flatness: ±0.01mm
- Parallelism/Perpendicularity: ±0.02°
- Form deviation: ±0.05mm
- Point density: 0.1-1mm spacing
When performing inspections:
- Plan measurement strategy to capture all critical features
- Select appropriate datum references per drawing
- Verify calibration status of equipment
- Control environmental conditions (20°C ±2°C, <50% RH)
- Use appropriate fixturing to avoid deformation
- Implement statistical sampling plans
- Generate AS9100/IATF 16949 compliant reports
- Identify trends for process improvement
- Communicate results clearly to manufacturing
- Archive measurement data for traceability
GD&T Inspection Priority:
- Datum features first (establish reference frame)
- Critical safety features (structural, crash protection)
- Functional features (mating surfaces, sealing)
- Aesthetic features (gaps, flush, surface finish)
Reporting Standards:
- ISO 1101: Geometrical tolerancing
- ISO 4287: Surface texture
- ISO 10360: CMM acceptance and verification
- ASME Y14.5: Dimensioning and tolerancing
- VDA 5: Capability studies
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 55 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 8d9a43f7dc9c
metrology-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository birol91/quorum-agents (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 481 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
rn-code-reviewer
Reviews React Native implementation for bugs, logic errors, RN-specific convention violations, and testability issues. Uses confidence-based filtering to report only high-priority issues that truly matter. Triggers: "review this code", "check for bugs", "review the implementation", "are there any issues", "check…
embedded-systems
Implement Raspberry Pi 5 edge code for the edge service -- UART, camera, GPIO, systemd, and MOCKMODE fallbacks.
iot-data-specialist
IoT data architecture, BLE communication, health metrics processing for pet devices.
Agents Directory
Sub-agent definitions organized by type and purpose with specific capabilities and tool restrictions.
agent-spawning
Guide to spawning agents with Claude Code's Task tool.
ha-esphome-config-reviewer
Produces one bundled, read-only device-level review of an ESPHome device configuration: config-pattern conformance, credential and API/OTA hardening, schema currency against the official ESPHome docs, Home-Assistant-driven binding correctness, display rendering discipline, display design conformance (palette roles…